tp06 the accuracy of online encyclopedias
The lecture apparently refutes the point illustrated in the reading material. According to the professor, It is noticeable that encyclopedias are never perfect, yet the small price we pay is worth it. On the contrary, the reading contends the opposite stands that communal online encyclopedias contain several problems that make them less valuable.
The first point the professor uses to cast doubt on the reading is that there is no doubt that authors cannot avoid errors, and traditional encyclopedias are mostly never close to perfect. However, online websites are more liable to be corrected, by contrast, the errors in traditional forms might stay there for decades, which differs from the statement in the reading that the untrained editors will be downright inaccurate in several cases and make the online encyclopedias lack academic credentials.
Another evidence the speaker adopts to contradict the passage is that setting the website as the founders are the only ones allowed to change the information or hire particular editors to edit or adjust the web pages. However, the reading states that online encyclopedias allow unscrupulous users and vandals or hackers to edit the information on the platforms and decrease the accuracy of the encyclopedia.
In conclusion, the point made in the lecture contrasts with what is presented in the reading. As the professor claims, there is limited space for traditional encyclopedias to provide information so that the author ought to fit the restricted notes for people's interest, on the contrary, there is a great variety of space to place researches on online encyclopedias, which is the most intensive advantage over the traditional form, whereas the reading material holds that the online website focuses too frequently on popular topics and creates a false impression of what is essential.
- tp01 the arguments about a four day work week employment 88
- tp11 The decrease of readers in literature owing to the poor standard leads to a declining level of culture nowadays 93
- tp09 the arguments of the advantages of hydrogen fuel cell engines 92
- tp06 the accuracy of online encyclopedias 89
- Films can tell us a lot about the country where they were made What have you learned about a country from watching its movies Use specific examples and details to support your response 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, however, if, so, whereas, as to, in conclusion, no doubt, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 291.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3883161512 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95051954632 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546391752577 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 21.2450331126 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 121.288453238 49.2860985944 246% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 174.222222222 110.228320801 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.3333333333 21.698381199 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2222222222 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248660709371 0.272083759551 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984792668221 0.0996497079465 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100146617919 0.0662205650399 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149744263439 0.162205337803 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315175301596 0.0443174109184 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 13.3589403974 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 53.8541721854 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.0289183223 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.42419426049 119% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 63.6247240618 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.498013245 141% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.