TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people

In the lecture, the professor makes a series of points that cast doubt on all the arguments presented in the reading passages about the advantages of working in a group in certain projects.
First of all, the paragraph mentions that working in a group can work more quickly because of number of people of different skill set are involved and greater resources are available. But professor cast a doubt on this point, saying that greater the people present, more would be different in opinions. Lot of Time is gone upon agreeing the idea among all the members of group. So this would eventually slower the process.
Secondly, paragraph mentions that working in a group can result in more creative solution than the other way. But the professor doesn’t agree with this idea, he rather thinks that some of member would influence other members and direct the project in very wrong way.
Thirdly, paragraph mentions that working in a group would provide the individual team member to “shine”, to get his or her contributions and ideas not only recognized but recognized as highly significant. But the professor doesn’t agree with the idea, he thinks that some influenced people in group can change and convince most of the other member in a wrong way, in this whole game, because of these influencer all get blamed.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 363, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e and convince most of the other member in a wrong way, in this whole game, because of these i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 410, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this influencer' or 'these influencers'?
Suggestion: this influencer; these influencers
...ong way, in this whole game, because of these influencer all get blamed.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1113.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 223.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99103139013 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72634676434 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 145.348785872 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515695067265 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9687161242 49.2860985944 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.666666667 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360825025243 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155264232901 0.0996497079465 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797338047905 0.0662205650399 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219700041302 0.162205337803 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631586279723 0.0443174109184 143% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.