The lecture and the reading are all talking about the advantages and the importance of working with a team rather than an individual. The author explains that when more people are involved in a work, their wider range of knowledge and skills contributes to the fast completion af a work. However, the professor states that very few people work whiles others sit and watch rather than contributing and refutes each of the reasons made by the author
First, the reading states that, the work moves faster because of the large number of people contributing to the work. On the contrary , the professor debunks this statement by stating that, the work does not move on quickly because very decision taking is slower when everyone wants his or her views to be accepted by the qroup and this affects the quick completion of the work.
Second, the autor states that when a work I'd well done, there is a recognition for the hard work of the team as a whole. However, the professor refutes this statement by saying that there's no recognition for the real contributers of thwhat work done. This is because it is a group work and because it's a team even if someone sits idle without working, he or she will be recognised for the work done .
- TPO-01 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reaso 40
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 40
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 70
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 448, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s each of the reasons made by the author First, the reading states that, the work...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ontributing to the work. On the contrary , the professor debunks this statement by...
^^
Line 5, column 43, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'd
...cond, the autor states that when a work Id well done, there is a recognition for ...
^^
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ork Id well done, there is a recognition for the hard work of the team as a whole...
^^
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...r refutes this statement by saying that theres no recognition for the real contributer...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 300, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... because it is a group work and because its a team even if someone sits idle withou...
^^^
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...she will be recognised for the work done .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, well, while, talking about, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 1373.03311258 74% => OK
No of words: 218.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66055045872 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46754135337 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559633027523 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.431561389 49.2860985944 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.142857143 110.228320801 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1428571429 21.698381199 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4285714286 7.06452816374 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289365153453 0.272083759551 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147114411629 0.0996497079465 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408956204803 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199904342144 0.162205337803 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0143894267318 0.0443174109184 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.34 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 63.6247240618 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.