The professor illustrates three important argument about which have been discussed in the passage. In contrast to the passage professor talks about free riding of some members of a group whom are assigned to work on a certain project, frustrating of some team members for discarding their new ideas by others in group, and not reaching to a consensus in a group, which are in consistency with those are pointed in the passage.
First, the passage pointed out that, group members will get better feeling when they are going to work for ideas imposing by other members, while the professor took an example of having frustrated of some team members, since their ideas was discarded by others.
secondly, the reading says the people who works in a group are about to make decisions as easily as possible, while the professor took an example of a company, which it group after 6 month could not have a consensus, for some part of group recognition was a result of direct cooperation of some certain member of group not the others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...their ideas was discarded by others. secondly, the reading says the people who works ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'groups'?
Suggestion: groups
... took an example of a company, which it group after 6 month could not have a consensu...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'month' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'months'.
Suggestion: months
...le of a company, which it group after 6 month could not have a consensus, for some pa...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ain member of group not the others.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast, as a result, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 22.412803532 27% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 1373.03311258 62% => OK
No of words: 178.0 270.72406181 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8202247191 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 4.04702891845 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54081690339 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 145.348785872 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539325842697 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 419.366225166 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 13.0662251656 31% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 21.2450331126 207% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.0131569837 49.2860985944 193% => OK
Chars per sentence: 214.5 110.228320801 195% => OK
Words per sentence: 44.5 21.698381199 205% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 19.0 7.06452816374 269% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300840753051 0.272083759551 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184392434497 0.0996497079465 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758880999543 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223000225139 0.162205337803 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203616804377 0.0443174109184 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.5 13.3589403974 176% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.28 53.8541721854 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 11.0289183223 175% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 63.6247240618 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.6 10.498013245 187% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.