The reading and the lecture are both about making a team when dealing about a project. The author of the reading believes having a group in doing project has more benefits. The lecture casts doubt the point that the reading made. He thinks that the team for a project has not any positive effect.
First of all, the reading thinks that a group can have wider range of knowledge, and skills by having diverse people. Reading expects that the group of team can work quickly and have highly creative solution when they have problems. The lecture opposes the points that the reading made. The group with large member is hard to make agreement at the same time.
Secondly, the author points out that they can make the decision even though they are able to have risks because they feel better when they are group;but, the lecturer says that even though some of the people in the group mainly affect when they are making decision, all of the member in the group need to be responsible if the result goes wrong.
Finally, the reading believes that having a group is rewarding for member of team. If they work well in one group, they can have a chance to shine. However, the lecturer says that if some of the members work hard, that can let the other members to have a ride by having the people who can work instead of them.
- TPO 27The little ice age was a period of unusually cold temperature in many parts of the world that lasted from about the year 1350 until 1900CE There were unusually harsh winters and glaciers grew larger in many areas Scientist have long wondered what 70
- Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant. For instance, humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37°C, no matter whether the environment is warm or cold. Because dinosaurs wer 61
- A little over 2 200 years ago the Roman navy attached the Greek port city of Syracuse According to some ancient historians the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a burning mirror a polished copper surface curved to focus 84
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 60
- At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago there was a mass extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the next 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...oup in doing project has more benefits. The lecture casts doubt the point that the ...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a project has not any positive effect. First of all, the reading thinks that a ...
^^^
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...but, the lecturer says that even though some of the people in the group mainly affect when ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...y affect when they are making decision, all of the member in the group need to be responsi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 184, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ine. However, the lecturer says that if some of the members work hard, that can let the oth...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1087.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52916666667 5.08290768461 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.01845220542 2.5805825403 78% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4625 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 323.1 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.55342163355 84% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.2910714263 49.2860985944 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5833333333 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436089788868 0.272083759551 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171406873194 0.0996497079465 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0969210182938 0.0662205650399 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281999093287 0.162205337803 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665216482313 0.0443174109184 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 53.8541721854 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 12.2367328918 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.8 8.42419426049 81% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 63.6247240618 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.