The lecture gives reasons which states the same observations however, it removes all the doubt raised in the passage. The lecture states all the reason which clears the doubt regarding whether the painting is indeed of Rembrandt or not.
First, it is stated that Rembrandt was always meticulous with the small details of the portrait including clothing. The passage states that, the women in the portrait is seen wearing a white linen cap along with a luxurious fur coat, which is contradicting, as the white linen cap is only worn by servants, while the fur coat depicts of luxurious living. This is particularly peculiar of Rembrandt paintings. The lecture states that, upon x-ray analysis, it was found that the painting was tampered after around 100 years Rembrandt drew it. As per the analysis, the fur coat was drawn over the painting with an effort to make the painting look formal as well as increase the value of the painting.
Second, it is stated that, since the fur coat is dark in colour, there should be technically no light being reflected upon the face. However, in the portrait, a portion of the face is lit, as if the light was reflected from bottom of the painting. As per the passage, Rembrandt was very meticulous about this and he could not do such a blunder in the painting. However, the lecture clears the doubt regarding the issue, as upon analysis, in the original painting the women was wearing a light coloured cloth, which was causing it to reflect some light on the face. Thus, being consistent with the lighting.
Third, it is stated in the passage that, Rembrandt always drew on canvases with a single piece wooden panel. However, in this picture, several pieces of wood were glued together to make the panel, which was peculiar to other Rembrandt's paintings. But, the lecture states that upon careful analysis it was found that, when the painting was tampered with, the wooden panel was also tampered. In order to expand the panel several wooden pieces were glued to the original frame.
- TPO-03 - Integrated Writing Task Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rem 80
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 50
- "Sports stars & movie stars have an obligation to behave as role models for the young people who look up to them. In return for the millions of dollars that they are paid, we should expect them to fulfill this societal responsibility." -Write a respon 50
- A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim a 62
- It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most comp 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 50, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: dark
...t is stated that, since the fur coat is dark in colour, there should be technically no light b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'regarding', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.232142857143 0.261695866417 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.173469387755 0.158904122519 109% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0688775510204 0.0723426182421 95% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0459183673469 0.0435111971325 106% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0229591836735 0.0277247811725 83% => OK
Prepositions: 0.140306122449 0.128828473217 109% => OK
Participles: 0.0688775510204 0.0370669169778 186% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.42276915868 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.015306122449 0.0208969081088 73% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.145408163265 0.128158765124 113% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00510204081633 0.0158828679856 32% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.015306122449 0.0114777025283 133% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2026.0 1645.83664459 123% => OK
No of words: 347.0 271.125827815 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8386167147 6.08160592843 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.04852973271 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.340057636888 0.374372842146 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.242074927954 0.287516216867 84% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.172910662824 0.187439937562 92% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0979827089337 0.113142543107 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42276915868 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455331412104 0.539623497131 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 46.3528163071 53.8517498576 86% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0529801325 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.6875 21.7502111507 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.74649051 49.3711431718 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.625 132.220823453 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6875 21.7502111507 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.875 0.878197800319 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 45.8949927954 50.5018328374 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.82105263158 1.90840788429 95% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.681868081796 0.549887131256 124% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.146686687332 0.142949733639 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0811052053577 0.0787303798458 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.629745039913 0.631733273073 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.171112225676 0.139662658121 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.33975670566 0.266732575781 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933980706599 0.103435571967 90% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.570181112571 0.414875509568 137% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.084028007063 0.0530846634433 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.534344815672 0.40443939384 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764193083011 0.0528353158467 145% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.2958057395 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.