The reading and lecture both discuss the communal online encycopedias and traditional pronted encyclopedias. While the reading states three disadvatages of online encyclopedias, the professor refutes, says, none of these claims are conviencing.
Fisrt of all, the reading states that there are errors at online encyclopedia and they are inaccuate. But, the traditional printed encyclopedia are written by professional writers. However, the professor argues this point by saying that online materials are not perfect, but traditional encyclopedia are not close to be perfect. Moreover, the errors at online encyclopeia are easy to be deleted or corrected. However, the errors at printed version would stay for decaies.
In addition, the reading claims that there are many hackers can add or delete much information from the online encyclopedia. So, the online articles are not accurate. On the other hand, the professor rejects this point saying that the online encycopedia are protected from hacker. This is because these version wrote by format that no one cannot make any changes. So, these materials are very reliable. Also, he states that there are many editors who monitor these online sites and they can eliminate any changes.
Finally, the article states that the online encyclopedia misleads the readers to judge which article are important and which one are not, while the traditional one are very specific. Nevertheless, the professor question this notion by pointing out that traditional encyclopedia has very limited space. So, they always decide what is important and what not. But, the academic diversity cannot affect them. In addition, acadamic diverisity is considered strongest advantage. This diversity could not be availabe in traditional encyclopedias.
- TPO 37 Integrated writing 3
- TPO-09 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 31 - Integrated Writing Task 73
- TPO 41 - integrated writing 60
- TOEFL T P O 34 - Integrated Writing Task 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the reading states three disadvatages of online encyclopedias, the professor refu...
^^
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this version' or 'these versions'?
Suggestion: this version; these versions
... protected from hacker. This is because these version wrote by format that no one cannot make...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 442, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'considered the strongest'.
Suggestion: considered the strongest
...em. In addition, acadamic diverisity is considered strongest advantage. This diversity could not be ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5962962963 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9139205179 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507407407407 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.0 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0537599017 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.5263157895 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2105263158 21.698381199 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15789473684 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0663117745657 0.272083759551 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0237678154872 0.0996497079465 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0170894395477 0.0662205650399 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0408861231402 0.162205337803 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191104545764 0.0443174109184 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 53.8541721854 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.