The article states that the critics have raised doubts related to the accuracy of memoir that the chevalier has invented or distorted many events to make his life seem exciting and provides three reasons of support. However the professor explains that everything was accurate which was stated by chevalier and it was a reliable history and opposes each reason.
First, the reading states that the chevalier was not a wealthy person and has borrowed large sums of money from swiss merchant. The professor refuses this point by saying that it took time to sell his properties in order to get money. He also states that he borrowed money only for short time before his assets turn into money and he was really a wealthy person.
Second, the article claims that there are doubts whether chevalier met voltaire or not. However, the professor mentions that chevalier wrote everything about he meeting voltaire. According to professor though it happened before many years the book had entire information about how regularly he consulted voltaire.
Third, the reading says that the chevalier was not escaped by making hole instead he bribed the jailers to free him. The professor opposes this point by explaining that the ceiling of the prison was repaired after his escape. If it was so easy to get escaped by bribing then many of the other prisoners could have escaped and got freedom. We also learn that if the chevalier hasn't escaped by making hole the prison wouldn't have required to get repaired.
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible. First, atmospheric 73
- TPO-08 - Integrated Writing Task Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including ki 81
- In 1912 a bookseller named Wilfrid M. Voynich acquired a beautifully illustrated handwritten book (manuscript) written on vellum (vellum is a material that was used for writing before the introduction of paper). The "Voynich manuscript," as it became kno 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... and provides three reasons of support. However the professor explains that everything ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: HE_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'about the meeting'?
Suggestion: about the meeting
...entions that chevalier wrote everything about he meeting voltaire. According to professor though...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'meets'.
Suggestion: meets
...hat chevalier wrote everything about he meeting voltaire. According to professor though...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or opposes this point by explaining that the ceiling of the prison was repaired a...
^^
Line 4, column 376, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...om. We also learn that if the chevalier hasnt escaped by making hole the prison would...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 416, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...hasnt escaped by making hole the prison wouldnt have required to get repaired.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, really, second, so, then, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94444444444 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34386458316 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8550318718 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.833333333 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465936762733 0.272083759551 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166578536886 0.0996497079465 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701838518073 0.0662205650399 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262959206872 0.162205337803 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376410887037 0.0443174109184 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.