The reading and lecture both discuss the idea of using the fuel-cell engines instead of the traditional internal-comustion engine. While the reading states three advantages of using the fuel-cell engine, the professor refutes,saying that hydrogen engine could not be the solution.
Firstly, the article clamis that the internal-cobustion engine depends on petroleum which is a finite resource, but the fuel-cell engine depends on hydrogen which is unlimited resource. One the other hand, the speaker argues this notion by saying that we can not find hydrogen for the cars easily as the hydrogen in the water. He mentions that hydrogen should be in a pure liquid status. Also, this process is a highly artificial process and very difficult procedures. In addition, we have to storge this hydrogen in a very cold palce, this is required a very specific cooling technique. So, this manufacture procedures are not practice.
In addition, the reading shows that hydrogen-based fuel cells are more benificial because they will end many of the polltion problems. This is because they byproduct is water. However, the professor rejects this by pointing out that using the hydrogen- cells fuel could not solve this problem because the manifacture of this hydrogen produce high pollution. In addition, the purifacation process needs oil burning which increase the pollution. So, the factory that produce hydrogen will pollute the country.
Lastly, the reading avers that fuel-cell engine has a good compatitive price. Neverthelss, the professor refutes saying that the manifacture og hydrogen is very expensive. This manifacture needs platinum which is so expensive. Moreover, we can not produce this hydrogen without this materials. In addition, using any other materials in the manifacture process so far unsuccessful.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 37 Integrated writing 3
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 66
- TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would 71
- TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , saying
... fuel-cell engine, the professor refutes,saying that hydrogen engine could not be the s...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reading avers that fuel-cell engine has a good compatitive price. Neverthelss, t...
^^
Line 7, column 280, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e can not produce this hydrogen without this materials. In addition, using any other...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, moreover, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 280.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99492768473 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507142857143 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 479.7 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4348170634 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5555555556 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5555555556 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 7.06452816374 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391934946854 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122988102602 0.0996497079465 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102711697909 0.0662205650399 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262169727037 0.162205337803 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660296685104 0.0443174109184 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.