The reading and the lecture are both about the reliability of the particular portrait, defined as an important evidence to illustrate an influential novelist in the past, named Jane Austen. The author of the reading believes that the painting refers to the mentioned woman while the lecturer casts doubt the claims made in the article. He thinks the specification of the lady in the picture should not be considered as characteristics of her for the following reasons.
First of all, the author points out several years after Jane death, her next generations’ family let scholars use the picture in order to edit her scripts. Apparently, her family has confirmed the validation of the image. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He says Jane had been dead nearly 70 years before letting the scholars work on the image. Moreover her family had not seen her with their eyes.
Secondly, the author contends that the characteristics of the face, depicted in the portrait, are similar to the features of her sister's painting introducing Jane Austin. The lecturer refutes this argument. It is mentioned that some generation of Austen family has features inherited from their ancestor including Jane. Thus, it is more plausible that the women in the Austen’s family resembled to Jane.
Eventually, the author states that the age of the woman on the picture could be estimated nearly equal to the period of Humphrey's activity, hired by the Austen family to depict Jane's picture. Besides that, the style of drawing the picture is like the Humphrey's artworks. The lecturer, on the other hands, posits the age of Jane, when he was working in Austen's society, was older than the face of the woman on the painting, consequently; the picture could not be regarded as an artwork of him.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...letting the scholars work on the image. Moreover her family had not seen her with their ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, consequently, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 298.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03355704698 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78294561048 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53355704698 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5041641004 49.2860985944 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362252752886 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10994223137 0.0996497079465 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855861599827 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216192390774 0.162205337803 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.071156000131 0.0443174109184 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.