The reading and the lecture are both about the probability of migrating particular dinosaurs, called Edmontosaurus, from the north to the south during arctic climates in the past. The author explains some reasons in order to advocate this argument while the lecturer casts doubt on the claim made in the article as the following statements.
First of all, the author points out the cold climate persuades these animals to go south in regard to finding plants in the temperate locations providing the dinosaur nutrition. The lecturer challenged this point. She suggests the average temperature of weather at that time was so warmer than today; consequently, the situation for growing plants was convenient. Furthermore, arctic sunshine was nearly 20 hours per day establishing good circumstance to create plants with lots of nutrition.
Secondly, according to the assertion of the author, unearthed skeletons of the mentioned animals could be considered as the noticeable evidence to prove their migration. He elaborates, these animals stayed in herd been essential for migrating from origins to destinations. The lecturer refutes this point. She says a large number of animals are accompanying together in relation to defending themselves from the attack of predators, including Roosevelt’s Elk.
Eventually, the capability of moving long distances has been regarded as the final factor mentioned by the author. He states that the speed of these animals were nearly 50 kilometers per weak. Moreover they could run fast up to 45 kilometers per hour; subsequently, they could migrate 1600 kilometer from north to the south so quickly. The lecturer, on the other hands, posits only adult animals had these abilities and their children did not have enough power to go to the mentioned distances conveniently. Thus, these dinosaurs might have stayed in the north in regard to protecting their juveniles.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e lecturer refutes this point. She says a large number of animals are accompanying together in re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...als were nearly 50 kilometers per weak. Moreover they could run fast up to 45 kilometers...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 291, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilometer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilometers'.
Suggestion: kilometers
...; subsequently, they could migrate 1600 kilometer from north to the south so quickly. The...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, first of all, in regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 298.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42617449664 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94704436552 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604026845638 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3137987859 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.8 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26490018798 0.272083759551 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780426824752 0.0996497079465 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548310384296 0.0662205650399 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143516546412 0.162205337803 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513435003186 0.0443174109184 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.