TPO 12 - Jane Austen Portrait
In the reading passage, the author claims that the professional painting, which is full-length portrait of a teenager girl is the picture of Jane Austen, who was an illustrious English novelist, by pointing out 3 reasons of support. However, finding all the ideas implausible and questionable, the professor casts doubt on what is presented in the text and states some evidence to the contrary.
At first, the author argues that the Austen's family allows to utilizing this portrait as a depiction attributing to Austen. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that this authorized letter cannot prove whether it is the Austen's image or not since Jane Austen had died at least 70 years before the first people had this declaration. Indeed, those individuals even could not have seen her, and subsequently, they could not contend with certainty that this portrait is Jane Austen.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that the resemblance of the Cassandra's sketch and the portrait can provide further legitimacy to the owner of the picture. On the other hand, the lecturer disputes this point by clarifying that it could be some of her relatives. In fact, so large was Austen's extended family including her cousins and other females that they could have had similarities with Jane. Therefore, it is possible that the subject of the portrait was the distance niece of Jane.
Finally, the author asserts that the style of the painting is another proof of its subject since it is traced back to 1790s, the time that Jane was teenager. The professor, thought, dismisses it by subscribing to the fact that the other evidence shows the date later than that time. For instance, the stamp at the back of the painting revealed that the blank canvas sold by William Legg in London when Jane Austen was about 27 years old which is much older than the age of the girl in the picture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-13 | dorsagh | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-01 | zhrnrz-1992 | 80 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Sepehram | 70 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Sepehram | 83 | view |
| 2019-05-22 | luoluomelody | 75 | view |
- TPO 1 - Intergrated:4 days working instead of 5 day 85
- Agree or disagree. Government should spend more on early education than on college education. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to take risks and explore new things when you are older than when you are young. 70
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads TO what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- TPO 11: a decline in reading the literature 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, however, if, so, therefore, at least, for instance, in addition, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 321.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88785046729 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58799580098 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545171339564 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.1853241533 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.75 110.228320801 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06452816374 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452300713817 0.272083759551 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156922717216 0.0996497079465 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108219799851 0.0662205650399 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259353170026 0.162205337803 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381337826044 0.0443174109184 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.