TPO 12 - Jane Austen Portrait
In the reading passage, the author claims that a full-length portrait of a teenager girl is the picture of Jane Austen, who was an illustrious English novelist, by pointing out 3 reasons of support. However, finding all the ideas implausible and questionable, the professor casts doubt on what is presented in the text and states some evidence to the contrary.
At first, the author argues that Austen's family allowed utilizing this portrait as a depiction attributing to Austen. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that this authorization cannot demonstrate whether it is Austen's image or not since Jane Austen had been died at least 70 years before her relatives made this declaration. Indeed, having not seen Jane themselves, they could not contend with certainty that this portrait is Jane Austen.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that the resemblance of Cassandra's sketch and the portrait can provide further legitimacy to the owner of the picture. On the other hand, the lecturer disputes this point by clarifying that it could be some of her relatives. In fact, so large was Austen's extended family including her cousins and other females that they could have had so many similarities with Jane. Therefore, it is possible that the subject of the portrait was the distance niece of Jane.
Finally, the author asserts that the style of the painting is another proof of its subject since it is traced back to 1790s, the time that Jane was a teenager. The professor, thought, dismisses it by subscribing to the fact that the other evidence shows the date later than that time. For instance, the stamp at the back of the painting indicates that the blank canvas sold by William Legg in London when Jane Austen was about 27 years old. This time is much older than the age of the teenager girl in the picture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-13 | dorsagh | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-01 | zhrnrz-1992 | 80 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Sepehram | 70 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Sepehram | 83 | view |
| 2019-05-22 | luoluomelody | 75 | view |
- TPO 28- integrated writing - Peary's trip to the North Pole 85
- Has the ease of the cooking improved life 79
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- TPO 25 90
- TPO44 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, however, if, so, therefore, at least, for instance, in addition, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 312.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90064102564 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61260024926 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544871794872 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.636514156 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.615384615 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06452816374 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.443360770437 0.272083759551 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150950860525 0.0996497079465 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103536399465 0.0662205650399 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259019386365 0.162205337803 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456424099376 0.0443174109184 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.