The reading is about selling the important fossil to private ownership nate is an unfortunate development and provides three reasens for it. However, the professor completely disagree with the article and refutes each ofauthor's reason.
First, the reading states that it is harder for public to see fossils. The professor says that public will have more access to the fossils to see them. She says that selling the fossils to private collector make it eassy to public, public shoolscan display display them.
Second the reading states that scientists lose access to some of the most important fossils and thereby miss out on potentially crucial discoveries about extinct life forms. The professor states that scientists do not miss anything.
Finally, the reading states that commercial fossil collectors often destroy valuable scientific evidence associated with the fossils they uneart. The professor there are many things that is undiscovered. She says that more fossil result in more data. Also, she says that many fossil are undiscovered.
- At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago, there was a mass-extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species. It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the next 71
- Although a house and an apartment have the same functions they are different in some aspects. Discuss them. 60
- Who influence more family or friends 71
- People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries 53
- Who influence more, family or friends? 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: display
...ke it eassy to public, public shoolscan display display them. Second the reading states that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 272, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun fossil seems to be countable; consider using: 'many fossils'.
Suggestion: many fossils
...esult in more data. Also, she says that many fossil are undiscovered.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.22905027933 0.261695866417 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.178770949721 0.158904122519 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.122905027933 0.0723426182421 170% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0558659217877 0.0435111971325 128% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0502793296089 0.0277247811725 181% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0949720670391 0.128828473217 74% => OK
Participles: 0.0167597765363 0.0370669169778 45% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.5819694613 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0391061452514 0.0208969081088 187% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00558659217877 0.00154638098197 361% => OK
Determiners: 0.0949720670391 0.128158765124 74% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00558659217877 0.0158828679856 35% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00558659217877 0.0114777025283 49% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1049.0 1645.83664459 64% => OK
No of words: 163.0 271.125827815 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.43558282209 6.08160592843 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 4.04852973271 88% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.453987730061 0.374372842146 121% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.337423312883 0.287516216867 117% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.19018404908 0.187439937562 101% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.147239263804 0.113142543107 130% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5819694613 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 145.348785872 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558282208589 0.539623497131 103% => OK
Word variations: 47.0140269458 53.8517498576 87% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 14.8181818182 21.7502111507 68% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8857162185 49.3711431718 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3636363636 132.220823453 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8181818182 21.7502111507 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.636363636364 0.878197800319 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 48.5605131065 50.5018328374 96% => OK
Elegance: 1.19607843137 1.90840788429 63% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.635652864962 0.549887131256 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.166980792117 0.142949733639 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.127144139699 0.0787303798458 161% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.664717852904 0.631733273073 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.121945838264 0.139662658121 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.280464308348 0.266732575781 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138504461705 0.103435571967 134% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.252192599644 0.414875509568 61% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0266230568769 0.0530846634433 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.412556808908 0.40443939384 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689886612997 0.0528353158467 131% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 3.1766004415 189% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.