Both the passage and the lecture relate to the control the number of cane toad population in Australia. On the one hand, the passage mentions three ways that are helpful in taking over the population of the cane toad, while the lecture refutes all these reasons by saying that these ways will have many negative effects on the environment and opposes what that passage proclaims.
First of all, the passage states that making a national fence could be a way to keep the cane toads population from growing up. In contrast, the lecture disagrees with this point by explaining that the young cane toad and toad’s eggs locate in the river. They are able to get through the fence by flowing water from one side to another. Therefore, creating a fence is not an efficient way.
In addition, the passage goes on to say that the government should conduct a campaign in order to collect the cane toads and their eggs. In that way, they can remove them from the environment. However, the lecture emphasizes that volunteers who are untrained will hurt other animals like native frogs as well.
Last but not least, the passage asserts that scientists try to control the toad cane population by imposing a type of disease-causing virus on them. Conversely, the lecture disputes this point by claiming that the toad canes are transported by researchers or pet collector to other parts of the country. So, the virus will be spread in the all parts due to the whole ecosystem will be infected.
- Tpo 25 integrated task 3
- TPO 50 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide 70
- TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task The United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, t 80
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 86
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'conversely', 'first', 'however', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.267605633803 0.261695866417 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.140845070423 0.158904122519 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.056338028169 0.0723426182421 78% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0316901408451 0.0435111971325 73% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0176056338028 0.0277247811725 64% => OK
Prepositions: 0.133802816901 0.128828473217 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0457746478873 0.0370669169778 123% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.53615322049 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0316901408451 0.0208969081088 152% => OK
Particles: 0.00704225352113 0.00154638098197 455% => OK
Determiners: 0.151408450704 0.128158765124 118% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0246478873239 0.0158828679856 155% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0105633802817 0.0114777025283 92% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1497.0 1645.83664459 91% => OK
No of words: 257.0 271.125827815 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82490272374 6.08160592843 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04852973271 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.295719844358 0.374372842146 79% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.24513618677 0.287516216867 85% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.147859922179 0.187439937562 79% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.105058365759 0.113142543107 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53615322049 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548638132296 0.539623497131 102% => OK
Word variations: 54.020423314 53.8517498576 100% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0529801325 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.4166666667 21.7502111507 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1062979234 49.3711431718 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.75 132.220823453 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 21.7502111507 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.916666666667 0.878197800319 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 45.9302853437 50.5018328374 91% => OK
Elegance: 2.35185185185 1.90840788429 123% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.731183848703 0.549887131256 133% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.113052027892 0.142949733639 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0893076380248 0.0787303798458 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.620736565207 0.631733273073 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.159995158974 0.139662658121 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.362556781672 0.266732575781 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140785922671 0.103435571967 136% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.443465027435 0.414875509568 107% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0345057474288 0.0530846634433 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.564078528413 0.40443939384 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459859032599 0.0528353158467 87% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 10.2958057395 78% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.