TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task
The United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can the from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, through the Bronze Age, the Iron Age, the time of the Roman colonization, the Middle Ages, up to the beginnings of the industrial age. Yet for most of the twentieth century, the science of archaeology,dedicated to uncovering and studying old cultural artifacts,was faced with the problems and limitations in Britain.
First, many valuable artifacts were lost to construction projects. The growth of Britain's population, especially from the 1950s on, spurred a lot of new construction in British cities, towns, and villages. While digging foundations for new buildings, the builders often uncovered archaeologically valuable sites.Usually, however, they proceeded with the construction and did not preserve the artifacts. Many archaeologically precious artifacts were therefore destroyed.
Second, many archaeologists felt that the financial support for archaeological research was inadequate. For most of the twentieth century, archaeology was funded mostly through government funds and grants, which allowed archaeologists to investigate a handful of the most only remained sites but which left hundreds of other the projects without support. Furthermore, changing government priorities brought about periodic reductions in funding.
Third, it was difficult to have a career in archaeology. Archaeology jobs were to be found at universities or with a few government agencies, but there were never many positions available. Many people who wanted to become archaeologists ended up pursuing other careers and contributing to archaeological research only as unpaid amateurs.
The reading passage and the lecture both discuss the problem of reducig the archaeological data throughout britain. In the reading part, the author mentiones that britain has long-term history, however becouse of the lack of data we cannot distongishe the artifacts and data from a period to an other period. In the listening part, In contrast, the speaker challenges what the author states and refutes the reasons.
To begin with, as mentioned in the article, the writer sets forth that valuable artifacts have destroyed, tesulting in growing the cities and papulations and cunstructions in britain coused the problem; nevertheless, the professor rebitts the reasons asserting that in 1990, laws have altered and constuctions had to work with archaeologists and they can see just the interests of them and than they can changed the palace. it means that without the permition of archaeologist they cannot do anything. Indeed, they should preserv the dacuments, which is discoverd in the sites.
Secondly, the author points out that goverments should suppprt archaeological excavations.Juat as the governments do not interest to invest their money for fild workes, So cannot archaeologist work on the sites. Nontheless, the speaker flatly contradicts the reasons and contends that excavations would be payed by construction companies not the governments; moreover, it couses the new sources of money for archaeology excavations rather than the past. Therefore for new sources it is growing now.
Finally, the author claims that there is no availabe jobs for archaeologists nowadays becouse neither do they have supports of governmants nor do they have positions in universities, lacking careers for experts. In contrasts, the lecturer is of the opinion that not only do archaeologists acssess to more data to examine, preserve, and work and the prosses of excavations, but also the more increasing exavations the more increasing jobs existes for archaeologists.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: AN_OTHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'another'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: another
...the artifacts and data from a period to an other period. In the listening part, In contr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: AND_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
... can see just the interests of them and than they can changed the palace. it means t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 425, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...m and than they can changed the palace. it means that without the permition of arc...
^^
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Juat
...ould suppprt archaeological excavations.Juat as the governments do not interest to i...
^^^^
Line 5, column 455, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ology excavations rather than the past. Therefore for new sources it is growing now. Fi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 304.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48355263158 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14300044277 2.5805825403 122% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559210526316 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 104.404331629 49.2860985944 212% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 151.545454545 110.228320801 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6363636364 21.698381199 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5454545455 7.06452816374 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210593495969 0.272083759551 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074926925707 0.0996497079465 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330380855435 0.0662205650399 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117672489442 0.162205337803 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231145592461 0.0443174109184 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.3589403974 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.2367328918 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.42419426049 118% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 63.6247240618 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.