tpo 16
The United Kingdom (Sometime referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, through the Bronze Age, the Iron Age, the time of the Roman colonization, the Middle Ages, up to the beginnings of the industrial age. Yet for most of the twentieth century, the science of archaeology—dedicated to uncovering and studying old cultural artifacts—was faced with serious problems and limitations in Britain.
The reading and lecture are both about the United Kingdom which had a long history of human settlement. The author of the reading feels that most of the site that unearth by the archaeology have face problem because of the United Kingdom's less carefulness. However, the lecturer challenged the claim made by the author. He is on the opinion that new role adopted by the Uk and changed the whole situation.
To begin with, the author argues that many precious artifacts destroyed because of the construction of buildings. He also mentions that during the digging many of the artifact found in the site but not well preserved. The specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He states that according to the new guideline if any site was visible, it was examined by the archaeologically very properly. If the site found as a value, then they make planed and allowed for the construction.
Second, the writer suggests that most of the archaeologically had less support. He also claims that the fund was granted by the government had little and difficult to investigate to sites. However, the lecturer rebuts this by mentioning that the fund of the construction site paid by the site owner, not the government. He also claims that if all the work cleared the owners paid the found to the archaeologist.
Third, the author posits that career as an archaeologist was difficult and the job position was limited. In contrast, the author position is that the new guideline provided adequate support for the archaeologist. He also mentions that by examing the sites they were writing reports, article and that time more scholar archaeologist existed which was the highest as ever been.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, then, third, well, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 282.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97872340426 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85351725707 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503546099291 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 431.1 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.368597846 49.2860985944 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.75 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283009031556 0.272083759551 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888094313041 0.0996497079465 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475544931137 0.0662205650399 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16682929901 0.162205337803 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360854616823 0.0443174109184 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.