TPO-17
In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States—birds in particular. Unfortunately for birds, these trends are likely to continue, with the result that the number of birds in the United States will necessarily decline.
The reading and the lecture are both about the decreasing number of birds in the United States. The text claims that this is an effect of the fast growth rate of people in the world, as well as agriculture and pesticides used. The lecture opposes to the state in the reading. She is of the opinion that those are not convincing arguments to explain this phenomenon.
First, the text argues that the natural habitats used by birds are now the new homes for people. The cities are being expanded to allow to new citizens could have their places to live, including all the services associated. For example the construction of malls and offices. On the other hand, the lectures challenged this by explaining that actually, these places have attracted a variety of birds to live there. For instance, peaches and falcons. Moreover, they can provide better and larger habitats.
Secondly, the article mention that it is due to the lands used by agriculture that birds cannot longer stay in their natural environments. The lecture refute this specific argument by explaining that it is incorrect the way the article assume this fact. Nowadays, the agriculture industry is based on a variety of crops, which are changes according the season. Is for this reason that there are not increases use of land. Even though, less land is used now in agriculture.
Third, the reading states that because increasing agriculture now the use of pesticides have arisen as well. This produces a consequently contamination of water and insect eaten by birds. However, the lecture disagrees with this argument. According to the listening, that was a bad behavior from the past that will not persist to the future. Furthermore, science has develop new crops, by genetic modifications that can resist to herbal invasions.
- President Piñera should be impeached. 76
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect in your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? * Interrupt and correct the mistake right away * Wait until the class or meeting 60
- TPO-17In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States—birds in particular. Unfortunately for birds, these trends are li 70
- TPO 38- Integrated writingThe world's forests are facing increasing pressure which, if unchecked, will threaten the health of many industries, economies, nations, and lives. The development of an international fund to help developing countries implem 85
- State whether you agree or disagree with the statement. Then explain your reasons using specific details in your explanation. President Piñera should be impeached. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ell as agriculture and pesticides used. The lecture opposes to the state in the rea...
^^^
Line 3, column 505, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...can provide better and larger habitats. Secondly, the article mention that it is...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'refutes'.
Suggestion: refutes
...their natural environments. The lecture refute this specific argument by explaining th...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('consequently') instead an adjective, or a noun ('contamination') instead of another adjective.
...des have arisen as well. This produces a consequently contamination of water and insect eaten by birds. How...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 369, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'developed'.
Suggestion: developed
...to the future. Furthermore, science has develop new crops, by genetic modifications tha...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, well, for example, for instance, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 299.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03678929766 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68836829306 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551839464883 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.47225739 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.3 110.228320801 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.95 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276069032453 0.272083759551 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707547292231 0.0996497079465 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517000883782 0.0662205650399 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156910414217 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182494293625 0.0443174109184 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.36 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.