TPO-18 Integrated essay
The reading and lecture are both about three different methods of preserving evergreen tree named Torreya. While lecture argues that according to her all these methods are not predicted to have positive results.
First, author mentions technique of experimenting to grow large number of this trees in same cold, and wet regions of favorable microclimate. On the other hand, lecture refutes, she says that these areas predominantly impacted by surrounding warmer atmosphere due to the effect of global warming. As a result, this species possibly fail to reproduce in dry atmosphere.
Secondly, author emphasizes on the method of planting trees to the north part to preserve Torreya from complete depletion. On the contrary, lecture denies by proving example of Black locus, when grown in northern climate it destroyed other species by its tremendous widespread growth. So, she thinks its not good idea to follow unsuccessful technique.
Thirdly, author implies that tree can be nurtured in a controlled environment so that researchers can keep tack of persistence growth. While she points out that weak species do not possess enough strength to fight against diseases. Moreover, huge and diverse three species can resist to disease. As a consequence, researchers lack adequate means to save this tree from extermination. It is worth saying that; lecture proves her opinion that ways described in the reading to protect Torreya are not worth.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-03-29 | ilda | 85 | view |
2018-02-07 | Taniazehra | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Only people who earn a lot of money are successful.Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 3
- Integrated Essay 1 on Chevalier 3
- TPO 39 integrated essay 3
- People learn in different ways. Some people learn by doing things, other people learn by reading about things, others learn by listening to people talk about things.Which of these methods of learning is best for you? Use specific examples to support your 78
- TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylin 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...reserving evergreen tree named Torreya. While lecture argues that according to her al...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...f experimenting to grow large number of this trees in same cold, and wet regions of ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rs can keep tack of persistence growth. While she points out that weak species do not...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1225.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 227.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39647577093 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82885935052 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656387665198 0.540411800872 121% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3283809927 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2307692308 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4615384615 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227398768249 0.272083759551 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718326553039 0.0996497079465 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059211894664 0.0662205650399 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12806270721 0.162205337803 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367225674816 0.0443174109184 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.