Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours
Enjoying and being satisfied from job is one of the most critical concerns of the modern society, recently. In this regard, some people are of the opinion that work half a week for long hours has numerous and valuable advantages for society. On the other extreme of the rope, others think work all of the day for shorter hours having a lot of free time to do family work. While two groups take their positions, personally speaking, I believe that the first group carries more weight. In the following paragraph, I will cogently explain my reasons to justify my point view.
As the first and paramount reason, work some days for long time has direct and considerable impacts on the people’s morale. In others words, working on a few days can help them to pay more attention the family and bring more happiness. And that makes them perfect when they are at work and doing their job well. For instance, empirical research conducted by some master students at many universities shows when morale people are good, they can concentrate on their task and duties remarkably. As a matter of fact, they also strengthen their minds and obtain more positive energy encouraging them to deal with unprecedented challenges and any different problem in life enthusiastically. Therefore, the more time a person spends with his or her family, the more efficient and high-performance in work.
The second reason is that, when people work only three days a week, it can reduce traffic and air pollution. To shed more light on this matter, since labor go work every day, the car is used by them and this will increase the traffic on the streets. A significant example that strikes in my mind in about my experience. When I was student, not only was I late to school, but also punished for traffic. Also, I had difficulty breathing during the days due to air pollution. Thus, air pollution and high traffic have bad impact on people’s lives and they can’t do well daily chores. Hence, if people worked three days a week, they would have healthier life.
To wrap it up, all the afore mentioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that work in half a week with long hours allows people to have a good mood. Moreover, alleviate air pollution and traffic and people can do better work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 295, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... extreme of the rope, others think work all of the day for shorter hours having a lot of f...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 800, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...efficient and high-performance in work. The second reason is that, when people w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74430379747 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57786169803 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556962025316 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1371864687 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322393088263 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997536303088 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744957665839 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208252024995 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424308821258 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.