The reading states that in the united states, it had been common practice since the late 1960s not to suppress natural forest fires. And providing three supporting reason. But the professor says that this is a good creative one and refute each claim in the reading.
First the reading claims that yellowstone fires caused tremendous damage to the park's trees and other vegetation. In contrast the professor says that vegetation after fire will colonize by new planet for example after fire they saw planets that destroyed by it were replaced by new planet.
Second the reading states that the park wildlife was affected as well. Large animals like deer and elk were seen fleeing the fire. Conversely the professor says that after fire there will be create an ideal habitat for small animal like rabits, even the food chain will be stronger after fire.
Third,the reading claims that the fires compromised the value of the park as a tourist attraction, which in turn had negative consequences for the local economy. however, the professor says that tourisim will be not affected and there will be strong communication, so massive yellowstone not seen ,after fire that was happened in the summer of 1988 a lot of visitor came after this date.
- TPO27 (independent)If people have the opportunity of take a secured job they should take it right away, rather than waiting for a job that is more satisfying. 50
- It is sometimes said that borrowing money from a friend can harm or damage the friendship. Do you agree? Why or why not? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer. 60
- tpo6 70
- TPO 18 Integrated 60
- TPO 29Large numbers of dinosaur fossils have been discovered in deposits on Alaska's North Slope, a region that today experiences an extremely cold,arctic climate. One hundred million years ago, when those dinosaurs were alive, the environment of the Nort 50
it had been common practice since the late 1960s not to suppress natural forest fires.
it had been common practice not to suppress natural forest fires since the late 1960s.
But the professor says that this is a good creative one and refute each claim in the reading.
But the professor says that this is a good creative one and refutes each claim in the reading.
they saw planets that destroyed by it were replaced by new planet.
they saw planets that are destroyed were replaced by new planets.
there will be create an ideal habitat
there will create an ideal habitat
so massive yellowstone not seen
so massive yellowstones have not seen
Sentence: Conversely the professor says that after fire there will be create an ideal habitat for small animal like rabits, even the food chain will be stronger after fire.
Error: rabits Suggestion: No alternate word
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 17 in 30
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 9 12
No. of Words: 210 250
No. of Characters: 1013 1200
No. of Different Words: 119 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.807 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.824 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.332 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 67 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 46 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 30 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 17 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.333 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 16.905 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.407 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.65 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.064 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4