The reading states that in the united states, it had been common practice since the late 1960s not to suppress natural forest fires. And providing three supporting reason. But the professor says that this is a good creative one and refute each claim in the reading.
First the reading claims that yellowstone fires caused tremendous damage to the park's trees and other vegetation. In contrast the professor says that vegetation after fire will colonize by new planet for example after fire they saw planets that destroyed by it were replaced by new planet.
Second the reading states that the park wildlife was affected as well. Large animals like deer and elk were seen fleeing the fire. Conversely the professor says that after fire there will be create an ideal habitat for small animal like rabits, even the food chain will be stronger after fire.
Third,the reading claims that the fires compromised the value of the park as a tourist attraction, which in turn had negative consequences for the local economy. however, the professor says that tourisim will be not affected and there will be strong communication, so massive yellowstone not seen ,after fire that was happened in the summer of 1988 a lot of visitor came after this date.
- TOEFL Sample essay : integrated essay from TPO 10 70
- Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? 50
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other student prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer . Use reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 16 70
- agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should encourage their students to question everything. 60
it had been common practice since the late 1960s not to suppress natural forest fires.
it had been common practice not to suppress natural forest fires since the late 1960s.
But the professor says that this is a good creative one and refute each claim in the reading.
But the professor says that this is a good creative one and refutes each claim in the reading.
they saw planets that destroyed by it were replaced by new planet.
they saw planets that are destroyed were replaced by new planets.
there will be create an ideal habitat
there will create an ideal habitat
so massive yellowstone not seen
so massive yellowstones have not seen
Sentence: Conversely the professor says that after fire there will be create an ideal habitat for small animal like rabits, even the food chain will be stronger after fire.
Error: rabits Suggestion: No alternate word
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 17 in 30
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 9 12
No. of Words: 210 250
No. of Characters: 1013 1200
No. of Different Words: 119 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.807 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.824 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.332 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 67 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 46 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 30 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 17 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.333 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 16.905 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.407 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.65 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.064 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4