TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task
The article states that the “let it burn” policy caused much damage in forest fires in Yellowstone in 1988 and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that fire is a natural process in the ecological cycle and is creative, not destructive, and she refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading posits that Yellowstone fires damaged trees and vegetation of the park tremendously. The professor refutes this point by stating that by burning dominant trees and plants, new plants colonized the park, and the diversity of plants was increased. She explains that the plants which were in shad of other plants before found the opportunity to grow. Also, the seeds germinated more because of the much more heat caused by fires.
Second, the article claims that animal life was harmed from fires; large animals such as deer and elk escape the fire. However, the professor contends that small plants that dominated the park provided an opportunity for small animals like rabbits and hares to feed more. Therefore, the population of these animals grew.
Third, the reading avers that the fires reduce the tourist attraction of the park, which had a negative impact on the local economy. The lecture opposes this point by saying that it would be a problem if the fire would occur each year. Since it did not happen after that, tourism came back to the park very soon.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The more money people have, the more they should give away to charity. 66
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1181.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 235.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02553191489 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40188548239 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587234042553 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1382376745 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4166666667 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5833333333 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06452816374 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0639196713111 0.272083759551 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0233170119197 0.0996497079465 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0260098890394 0.0662205650399 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0372703805943 0.162205337803 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0158850839014 0.0443174109184 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.