TPO 21 integrated
Both the reading passage and the lecture discuss about planting genetically modified trees. However, the lecturer holds a contrast idea as the writer.
Firstly, the reading passage suggests that the genetically modified trees are more likely to survive, while the lecturer refutes this statement by pointing out that uniform chareteristic of the genetically modified trees may make them more vulnerable. Since the nature trees have some genetical diversity between them, few nature trees resist virus and survive. On the other hand, the genetic trees are uniform and when the climate changes, all of the genetically modified trees die.
Second, the writer claims that genetically modified trees make vast and fast profit for farmers. Nevertheless, the lectures argues that by the law, farmers should pay for every genetically modified trees to the government. And the cost is not mentioned by the writer.
Last but not the least, the lecturer says that the using of genetically modified trees to prevent the native trees from extinction is totally unwise. Genetically modified trees grow faster and stronger in an aggressive way than nature trees. As a result, nature trees are not able to compete essential resources such as sun, water and soil with them. In the end, the environment will be crowed with genetically modified trees.
In conclusion, the lecturer disagrees with the merits that the writer proposes to plant genetically modified trees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 441, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...e uniform and when the climate changes, all of the genetically modified trees die. Second...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 202, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an aggressive way" with adverb for "aggressive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...modified trees grow faster and stronger in an aggressive way than nature trees. As a result, nature ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1225.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 229.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34934497817 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63115566073 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545851528384 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.8170112944 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2307692308 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6153846154 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06452816374 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.513929870572 0.272083759551 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.211136410818 0.0996497079465 212% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117914318776 0.0662205650399 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288137163881 0.162205337803 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12346202681 0.0443174109184 279% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.