TPO 40 Integrated
Both the lecture and the reading discuss the posibility for human to live on Venus. However, they hold a contradic idea.
First, the reading passage claims that because of the heavy atmospheric pressure, all spacecrafts will be crushed, while the lecturer disagrees. The lecturer proposes that we can build a floating space station which is 15 kilometers away from the Venus' surface. The pressure 15 kilometers above is just like the pressure on Earth. By doing so, nothing will be crushed by the heavy pressure on Venus.
Secondly, the writer says that there are lack of water and oxygen which are both essential to human on Venus. On the other hand, the lecturer points out that despite of few water vapor and oxygen, humans can use abunden chemical materials such as carbon dioxide on Venus to make them.
Last but not the least, the writer suggests that most of the sunlight on Venus is either reflected or blocked, so humans are not able to use solar power cells. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes that the cloud on Venus is not very thick. Even some sunlight is reflected, humans still can collect and utilize them.
In sum, the author offers three reasons to support the impossibility for human to live on Venus, but the lecturer disagrees with them by providing three convincing arguments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...the lecturer points out that despite of few water vapor and oxygen, humans can use ...
^^^
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun water seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little water'.
Suggestion: little water
...the lecturer points out that despite of few water vapor and oxygen, humans can use abunde...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, while, even so, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 221.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89592760181 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44454474725 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592760180995 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4587043096 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1666666667 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4166666667 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332077443311 0.272083759551 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122596727691 0.0996497079465 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618617168222 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168615719308 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726666330197 0.0443174109184 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.