The reading and the lecturer are both about the genetically modified trees. The author of the reading states that by changing the genes and characteristics of the trees one can get good results and provides three reasons for support. However, the lecturer says that there are many problems with genetically modificated trees and refutes each of the author's points.
The article claims that genetically modified trees will have the greater chance of survival than unmodified trees. Furthermore, she provided an example of banana trees in Hawaii, which were affected by ringspot disease. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes this point by saying that uniform exposes to the climate change and environment for the genetically modified trees will wipe the trees. Moreover, he says they were not more resistant than unmodified trees.
Second, the text conveys that because of genetically modified trees one can get more economic benefits. Nevertheless, the lecturer opposes this point by saying that the cost to buy these trees is also more because the persons who grow these trees should pay to the company.
Third, the reading posits that by using genetically modified trees one can prevent the over exploitation of wild trees because the demand for wood and timber has grown, and destruction of forests is increased. This can be reduced by planting genetically modified trees. However, the professor says that these trees will cause damage to the other wild trees because they compete for the resources like sunlight and water along with the natural trees.
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 76
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 70
- TPO-13 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 80
- TPO-20 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1316.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24302788845 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54476594541 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509960159363 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 401.4 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8516423286 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.666666667 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.503960108484 0.272083759551 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.215400029226 0.0996497079465 216% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839122113762 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.330485540785 0.162205337803 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731932363045 0.0443174109184 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.