TPO 21- planting genetically modified trees
In the reading, the author claims that planting genetically modified trees has a number of benefits by pointing out three reasons for supporting the idea. However, finding all the ideas questionable and implausible, the lecturer totally repudiate the claim and presents some evidence to the contrary.
At first, the author argues that genetically modified trees are more resistant than the unmodified ones. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that they have few resistant than unmodified trees in the environmental challenges like climate changes. According to her, in this situation, some of the natural plants may destroy but some resistant trees remain sustainable, while, in the same hard condition, all the modified trees completely destroy and wipe out.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that genetically modified trees have more benefit economically for whose grow them because they grow faster and can give greater fruits or other products. On the other hand, the lecturer disputes this point by clarifying the fact that genetically modified trees have hidden costs. the lecturer explains that farmers have to charges money every time that they want to plant and also collecting trees and growing new plants has not cost for a farmer in unmodified trees however it charges cost for planting modified ones.
Finally, the author asserts genetically modified trees can preserve wild trees as the last point for supporting planting genetically modified trees. The lecturer, though, dismisses it by pointing out that genetically modified trees grow more aggressively than unmodified ones and make more damage. As she stated, modified trees grow among the natural trees and compete out with them in resources like sunrise, water and soils, as the result they crowded out native trees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-03-30 | taraneh taj | 81 | view |
- TPO 24 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO 20 – “let it burn” policy 65
- University students are often encouraged to study fields in which significant job growth (a large increase in job opportunities) is expected; these fields currently include science, technology, engineering, and math, do you believe students should conside 73
- agree or disagree: Although most people know about environmental problems, it so unlikely for these problems to be solved in future. 76
- animal's fossils containing actual tissues 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...s. According to her, in this situation, some of the natural plants may destroy but some res...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 330, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...cally modified trees have hidden costs. the lecturer explains that farmers have to ...
^^^
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'charge'.
Suggestion: charge
... lecturer explains that farmers have to charges money every time that they want to plan...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, however, if, may, so, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 10.4613686534 10% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 284.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41197183099 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62949438601 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521126760563 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6034111342 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.727272727 110.228320801 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8181818182 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90909090909 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.506116603157 0.272083759551 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.232007716774 0.0996497079465 233% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110457876053 0.0662205650399 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325178279706 0.162205337803 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112026872153 0.0443174109184 253% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.