In this set of materials, the reading claims that the ethanol is not an alternative to gasoline in the United States and provides three reasons of support. However, in the listening passage the lecturer casts doubt on this claim and refutes every reason mentioned in the reading passage.
First, the author of reading passage states that the increased use of ethanol fuel would not help to solve global warming problem. Since, burning ethanol releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere it has no advantages over gasoline. The professor refutes this claim. He explains that it is true that the ethanol releases carbon dioxide when it is burned for fuel but the plants used to produce ethanol absorbs substantial amount of carbon dioxide as a nutrient when they grow. Therefore, they remove extra carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
Second, the reading states that the production of significant amount of ethanol probably would result in dramatically reduce the amount of plants available for uses for feeding livestock, for instance. The author illustrates that for just 10 percent of the fuel needed for the United States consumption, more than 60 percent of the corn available now would be used. In the listening, however, the professor rejects this claim by saying that the parts used for ethanol production are which they are not used for livestock's feeding. Therefore, if the United State has to use this part of corn plant, cellulose, for ethanol production it would not reduce the amount of plant for feeding the livestock.
Third, the reading posits that ethanol fuel is affordable now just because of the United State government's subsidies. If the government stop helping ethanol producers in any form, the price of ethanol would increase to extend that it would not be able to compete with gasoline on price. In contrast, the professor states that the price of ethanol is would be cheaper in future. If ethanol consumption increases it will help to drop the price of ethanol in comparison to gasoline price. Consequently, the ethanol will be more available. A study reveals that if the consumption of ethanol increases for 30 percent its production price will be decreases for 40 percent.
- TPO-19 - Integrated Writing Task Many consumers ignore commercial advertisements. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing." The advertisers hire people,buzzers,who personally promote (buzz) products to people 86
- The rules that today s societies expect young people to follow and obey are too strict 93
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Most advertisements make products seem much better then they really are Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 93
- Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t help to solve global warming problem. Since, burning ethanol releases carbon dioxid...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 368, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...he price of ethanol is would be cheaper in future. If ethanol consumption increases it wi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 379, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... ethanol is would be cheaper in future. If ethanol consumption increases it will h...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'consequently', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'third', 'as to', 'for instance', 'in contrast', 'it is true']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.287878787879 0.261695866417 110% => OK
Verbs: 0.151515151515 0.158904122519 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0479797979798 0.0723426182421 66% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0454545454545 0.0435111971325 104% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0277777777778 0.0277247811725 100% => OK
Prepositions: 0.164141414141 0.128828473217 127% => OK
Participles: 0.0353535353535 0.0370669169778 95% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.62440389478 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.020202020202 0.0208969081088 97% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.116161616162 0.128158765124 91% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0252525252525 0.0158828679856 159% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00757575757576 0.0114777025283 66% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2207.0 1645.83664459 134% => OK
No of words: 362.0 271.125827815 134% => OK
Chars per words: 6.09668508287 6.08160592843 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.04852973271 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.414364640884 0.374372842146 111% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.303867403315 0.287516216867 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.174033149171 0.187439937562 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.124309392265 0.113142543107 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62440389478 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447513812155 0.539623497131 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 46.0539310669 53.8517498576 86% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0529801325 130% => OK
Sentence length: 21.2941176471 21.7502111507 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7079425538 49.3711431718 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.823529412 132.220823453 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2941176471 21.7502111507 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.764705882353 0.878197800319 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 51.6808579786 50.5018328374 102% => OK
Elegance: 2.16853932584 1.90840788429 114% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.839812543919 0.549887131256 153% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.161023857814 0.142949733639 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0954957421433 0.0787303798458 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.623313944951 0.631733273073 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.152120428396 0.139662658121 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.405031045033 0.266732575781 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128529214179 0.103435571967 124% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.445158199207 0.414875509568 107% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.074860551766 0.0530846634433 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.635540629956 0.40443939384 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628977488034 0.0528353158467 119% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 3.49668874172 257% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.1766004415 157% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 10.2958057395 165% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.