TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasol
The reading passage and lecture have conflicting opinions about whether it is a decent idea to replace gasoline as ethanol fuel. The article strongly postulates that it can not be a good alternative for gas in the US for three compelling reasons. On the other hand, the listening adamantly delineates that the writer's explanations are not plausible enough.
First and foremost, according to the author of the excerpt, it can not solve the environmental issues associated with the usage of gasoline: global warming. Since it emits a great amount of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Nonetheless, the lecture offsets these points by declaring that even though it is true that ethanol fuel is created by the burning process and discharges CO2, it does not contribute to global warming. This is mainly due to the fact ethanol fuel uses plants such as corn, so the process of removing works in this situation. To be more specific, the plants will absorb carbon dioxide as part of their nutrition, thus there is no harm in the environment.
On top this, the professor further asserts that this alternative utilises plant's cell wall which is not eaten by domestic animals. |As a result, it will not diminish plant usage of farm animal. These claims refute the writer's implications about it will certainly decline the main food of domestic animals which is an essential part of their life.
The article lastly points out that it can not compete with gasoline in the US economy. Furthermore, he insists that thanks to the current government's impose policy, their prices are the same. However, if the government halt to support producers soon, ethanol fuel's cost will certainly grow up. The speaker in the lecture counters these implications by mentioning that it will be not much affected by government decision about taxes. Since if the consumers buy it for a substantial amount, it will lead the alternative's price to decrease significantly. According to the evidence, it says that if the number of buyers increases by three times, its price will decrease by forty percent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | sandeshbhandari2 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | supergirl20 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | supergirl20 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | nusybah | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | S M Naimul Mamun | 71 | view |
- The reading states that dinosaurs were endotherms and author provides reasons threef support. However, the professor explains that dinosaurs were not actually an endothers animal and refutes each of the author's reasons.First of all, the articles cl 80
- tpo27 81
- integrated essay tpo19 88
- tpo27 80
- TPO 28Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him into an international celeb 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the usage of gasoline: global warming. Since it emits a great amount of carbon dioxi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, nonetheless, so, thus, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 1373.03311258 126% => OK
No of words: 344.0 270.72406181 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04069767442 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74072875435 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 145.348785872 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55523255814 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 419.366225166 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9597497727 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2352941176 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 4.33554083885 277% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321776334375 0.272083759551 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857776367849 0.0996497079465 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627474539089 0.0662205650399 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174097014346 0.162205337803 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716663832425 0.0443174109184 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 63.6247240618 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.