TPO24 Integrated Writing
The reading passage and lecture are both about the pros and cons of study the real animal tissues of archaic animals. The article strongly postulates that a 70-million-year-old artefact of T.rex' living tissues have substituted by minerals and it might still contain the relic of the actual tissues of the animal. On the other hand, the listening adamantly delineates that this remain shows baseless information for several compelling reasons.
First and foremost, According to the author of the excerpt that shattering of the leg bone exposed that many small channels inside and it aligns with hollows in the bones where blood vessels were once placed. Furthermore, it is surprisingly elastic and flexible compared to others. Nonetheless, the professor offsets these points by declaring that in the channels it is potential to flourish bacteria colonies and they merge with hollows to create non-organic material.
On top of this, the professor elaborates by bringing up the point that the archaeologists haven't found any same red blood cells from other animals which are same characteristics as both primitive and found a site so this evidence is likely to be reddish minerals. these claims refute the author's implications about inner bones have the presence of a realm that could be a relic of red blood cell which conveys oxygen to other cells.
The text lastly insists that dinosaur leg bone has contained collagen which essential elements of life and the researchers hope that it might contain in bone tissue. The speaker in the lecture counter these indications by asserting that older than 1000 years fossil hasn't been found any collagen so it is impossible to endure 70-million-year. Moreover, the collagen can exist only in human skin so it may be the researcher's collagen who brings bone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-24 | Hamide | 80 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | MinaSh | 76 | view |
| 2019-07-01 | alta | 88 | view |
| 2018-10-06 | Fateme_mhd | 88 | view |
| 2017-10-23 | Angelina2016 | 66 | view |
- Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Rembrandt's painting 80
- In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people has a wider range of knowledge, 90
- Would you prefer to live in a traditional house or in a modern apartment building? Use specific reasons and details to support your choice. 70
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...ng up the point that the archaeologists havent found any same red blood cells from oth...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...dence is likely to be reddish minerals. these claims refute the authors implications ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 266, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...rting that older than 1000 years fossil hasnt been found any collagen so it is imposs...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 412, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'researchers'' or 'researcher's'?
Suggestion: researchers'; researcher's
...ist only in human skin so it may be the researchers collagen who brings bone.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, lastly, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, still, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 292.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17808219178 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84494857732 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595890410959 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.9511190154 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.454545455 110.228320801 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5454545455 21.698381199 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394702073062 0.272083759551 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122731726024 0.0996497079465 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833956442723 0.0662205650399 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197151326068 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398020155905 0.0443174109184 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.