tpo 23
The material discusses the reasons that might cause yellow cedar trees declining. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlines in the reading passage.
Firstly, the reading details specific points regarding this topic, namely yellow cedar trees declined because of cedar bark beetle. Next, bears might damage cedar trees. Finally, trees might be declined due to climate changes.
Conversely, the listening challenges the points, one specific contradiction is healthy cedar is much more resistant to the beetle, because bark usually produces a powerful chemical which is poison to beetle; furthermore, beetle attacks trees which were already damage or sick. In addition to that, yellow cedar trees were damages insland where there were no bears, so declining happened with and without bears, which means bears were not the reason. One final point, cedar trees declined in the lower elevations where it is warmer than declining from the higher elevations where it is colder. If freezing was the reason, declining should happen more in the higher elevation. Consequently, there was not what killed them.
In summary, there are discrepancies in the presented information.
- some people believe that the Internet provides them with a lot of information, while others believe that access to much information creates problems? which do you prefer? 86
- tpo 54 3
- tpo 54 3
- tpo 8 3
- people who give extra money to charity or good are happier than people who spend their money on themselves 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ints outlines in the reading passage. Firstly, the reading details specific po...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t be declined due to climate changes. Conversely, the listening challenges the...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntly, there was not what killed them. In summary, there are discrepancies in t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, conversely, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, regarding, so, while, in addition, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 22.412803532 27% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 189.0 270.72406181 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54497354497 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57094950575 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603174603175 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 67.0675002276 49.2860985944 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2727272727 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1818181818 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8181818182 7.06452816374 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295955621938 0.272083759551 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112882770747 0.0996497079465 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760607695012 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158053820037 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112918936122 0.0443174109184 255% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.