tpo 23 yellow cedar tree
The material discusses the concept of the causing of declining the yellow cedar trees populations. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
Firstly, the listening details the point in regard to this topic, namely the decline of the tree may be caused by parasites. Next, the aggressive feeding habits of the brown bears may be responsible of this decline. Finally, the freezing climate in the winter cause damage to the trees’ roots and kill them.
Conversely, the listening challenges the points, one specific contradiction is the beetle only attack the trees which was already damage and sick, because the healthy yellow cedar trees could produce power chemical which poison these parasites. Therefore, this beetle is not the fundamental reason of the decline. In addition to that, the yellow cedar trees were located along an island where there were no bears, but they still declined from this island. Consequently, bears were not responsible for killing the tress because trees declined with and without the bears. One final point, yellow cedar tress declined more from the lower elevated where is warm than declining from the higher elevated where is cold. If the cold weather was the reason, so we expect the tress damaged more in the higher. That is mean the freezing weather is not the reason of killing the trees.
In summery, there are obvious discrepancies with the information presented.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-17 | hhzz | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-25 | Christine hanna | 60 | view |
| 2019-07-25 | Christine hanna | 60 | view |
| 2019-07-25 | Christine hanna | 70 | view |
- do you agree or disagree? people benefit more from traveling in their own countries than traveling to foreign countries? 73
- in the past, it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future? agree or disagree? 81
- life today is easier or 50 years ago? 76
- tpo 42 the glass building harms toward birds 63
- tpo 32 the quackers sound 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ing the yellow cedar trees populations. While the reading looks at the topic from one...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oints outlined in the reading passage. Firstly, the listening details the point...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o the trees' roots and kill them. Conversely, the listening challenges the...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s not the reason of killing the trees. In summery, there are obvious discrepanc...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pancies with the information presented.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, firstly, if, look, may, so, still, therefore, while, in addition, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1259.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20247933884 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54224937737 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553719008264 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.7451693204 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8461538462 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6153846154 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06452816374 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368744667402 0.272083759551 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127848448245 0.0996497079465 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750588110164 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184455649294 0.162205337803 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129294954011 0.0443174109184 292% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.