TPO 25
The lecturer and the reading discuss the possible application of the set of clay jars found in Iraq, and they have 2200 years old. Although the passage claims that these vessels did not use as batteries in ancient time, the speaker refutes this idea through a number of reasons which I will describe in this report.
First and foremost, the passage points out that these vessels did not have another some electricity conductors that help the clay jars for produce electricity. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that local people were founding the clay jars, not archaeologist. Therefore, the local people did not have information about worthy of equipment. Also, these types of equipment were uninteresting for the local people. Thus, they throw away these types of equipment.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that the copper cylinders are the same as the ones that were used for holding scrolls of sacred texts, so they are not ancient batteries, the speaker argues that they may be built for holding scrolls at first, but someone may have discovered that these cylinders could produce electricity in some ways. He adds that maybe batteries were discovered accidentally in this process.
Finally, although the reading passage says that the ancient people did not need electricity power, the speaker disagrees by mentioning that electric power not sensible. Also, when people touched the clays they could cause a middle shock. In this situation, they thought it is magic. She adds that ancient doctors used electricity power for reducing or stopping the pain.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who just focus on only one skill 73
- TPO 47 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- tpo 60 Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories mentioned in the reading passage 3
- At work or school, you might encounter a problem that requires creativity – for example, you are given a task to complete that is very different from other tasks you do. In work or school situation that requires you to think creatively, would you prefer 70
- TPO 46 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: HAVE_CD_YEARS[1]
Message: This phrase is used with 'be': 'be 2200 years old'.
Suggestion: be 2200 years old
...et of clay jars found in Iraq, and they have 2200 years old. Although the passage claims that thes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, may, so, therefore, thus, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21705426357 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54555277926 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53488372093 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.7584878491 49.2860985944 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.538461538 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368303236034 0.272083759551 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116133927954 0.0996497079465 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784299244665 0.0662205650399 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218288334849 0.162205337803 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774421036293 0.0443174109184 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.