TPO 25
The lecture and the reading discuss a set of clay jars that have been found in Iraq. Although the passage claims that these clays could not use as electric batteries, the speaker refutes this idea through several reasons which I will describe in this reporter.
First and foremost, the reading points out that these vessels would not have other things that used for producing electricity such as wires. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that the absence of wires or other contents are not mean these vessels did not have them. She explains that these two clay were discovered by local people, not by archaeologists. Hence, other continents were not attracted or important for local people. And they recognized their importance. Therefore, they did not carry them.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that a set of clay jars were used for holding scrolls of sacred texts, the professor argues that these clays were similar to cylinders for holding scrolls. But, after some time people found that by adding some liquid or iron vessels they could produce electricity. Also, ancient people did not use the continent for one purpose. They used these vessels for multiple purposes.
Finally, although the reading passage says that ancient people did not need electricity, the speaker disagrees by mentioning that electric power was magic for ancient people. They did not see it, but when they touched it, it makes shock to their body. So, they used it as magic powers. Also, ancient doctors used electricity for healing pains.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, so, therefore, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 255.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22745098039 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40342572374 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541176470588 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.8333169033 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.3125 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9375 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380996128232 0.272083759551 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123772961778 0.0996497079465 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597322639517 0.0662205650399 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225934878417 0.162205337803 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0790524552681 0.0443174109184 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.