TPO 25
The lecture and the reading discuss a set of clay jars that have been found in Iraq. Although the passage claims that these clays could not use as electric batteries, the speaker refutes this idea through several reasons which I will describe in this reporter.
First and foremost, the reading points out that these vessels would not have other things that used for producing electricity such as wires. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that the absence of wires or other contents are not mean these vessels did not have them. She explains that these two clay were discovered by local people, not by archaeologists. Hence, other continents were not attracted or important for local people. And they recognized their importance. Therefore, they did not carry them.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that a set of clay jars were used for holding scrolls of sacred texts, the professor argues that these clays were similar to cylinders for holding scrolls. But, after some time people found that by adding some liquid or iron vessels they could produce electricity. Also, ancient people did not use the continent for one purpose. They used these vessels for multiple purposes.
Finally, although the reading passage says that batteries were useless in those times, the professor disagrees by mentioning that these batteries could cause a middle shock, and they could be a good device to show magical power. He also said that ancient doctors may have been using these batteries in order to heat the muscles of the patients like modern medicines.
- TPO 43 80
- TPO 24 70
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or meeting 66
- TPO 61 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to make friends with intelligent people than with the people who have a good sense of humor. 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, may, so, therefore, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20849420849 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40344931837 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559845559846 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.9278787838 49.2860985944 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3571428571 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388616854659 0.272083759551 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130074650558 0.0996497079465 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600894484631 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225781199883 0.162205337803 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0791612092425 0.0443174109184 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.