The reading and lecture both discuss the causes behind forming the ice age period. While the reading provides three reasons that caused the ice age period, the professor refutes, saying none of these claims are convincing.
Firstly, the reading states that the galercials melted due to the warmer weather and caused disruption in the gulf stream. However, the professor refutes saying that the disruption i n golf strean caused cooling temperature at Europe and north America, But this disruption did not explain any cooling effect in this area.
Secondly, the reading avers that volcanic disruption released sulfer oxide to the air. Furthermore, this gas blocked the sun light. So, that caused dropped in the global temperature. On the other hand, the professor rejects this notion by saying that volcano disruption can cause cooling effect and cause visual effect. For instance, volaco can cause colorful sun light like and people can see the snow like blue instead of white. However, there was not any report to confirm that. As a result, the volcano disruption was not strong enough to cause huge amount of dust which might cause cooling effect.
Lastly, the reading mentions that the decrease in human populations caused increase in the carbon dioxide level in the air . This is because people did not cut the trees area to use it for agriculture. So, the green house effect has been decreased. Nevertheless, the professor contradicts this idea by pointing out that the drop of the green house effect can cause drop on temperature, but the human population went back to the normal size. Furthermore, people started to cut the trees down again to use these areas for food supply. Consequently, the green house effect could not be the cause behind forming the ice age period.
- TPO-46 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, medical information about patients traditionally has been recorded and stored on paper forms. However, there are efforts to persuade doctors to adopt electronic medical record systems in which informa 81
- TPO-14 - Integrated Writing Task Every year, forest fires and severe stormscause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States. One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging, which is the practice 60
- TPO 37 Integrated writing 3
- Our comunity is considered one of the most important aspects of our lives. The comunity is the place that we live in the whole time. It is aslo considered the city for our childern in the future. Some people I am sure would believe that young people nowad 66
- TPO 40 Integrated Writing Task 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ermore, this gas blocked the sun light. So, that caused dropped in the global temperatur...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... hand, the professor rejects this notion by saying that volcano disruption can ca...
^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e in the carbon dioxide level in the air . This is because people did not cut the ...
^^
Line 7, column 165, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'trees'' or 'tree's'?
Suggestion: trees'; tree's
... This is because people did not cut the trees area to use it for agriculture. So, the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, lastly, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, as for, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05762711864 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4673544208 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538983050847 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9759643614 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7647058824 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3529411765 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41176470588 7.06452816374 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286171549928 0.272083759551 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970700908321 0.0996497079465 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512354983402 0.0662205650399 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179813964062 0.162205337803 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210028307621 0.0443174109184 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.