The author discusses several possible reasons scientists provide for the Little Ice Age. However, The speaker disagrees each reason in the passage and states that they are out of date.
First, the author suggests that disruption of ocean currents may cause the Little Ice Age, but the professor explains that according to new researchers such disruption only affects Europe and North America and argues that this reason will not explain the phenomena in the southern hemisphere.
Next, the passage tells us about volcanic eruptions that caused sunlight blockage which results in temperature reduction. However, the speaker challenged this reason by saying that if such eruptions happened, the people would notice its visual effects, but there has been no report from that period supporting this reason.
Finally, the author states the decrease in human population following by absorbing greenhouse gases by trees as the cause of Little Ice Age. But the professor says such phenomena needs a lot of more time to take place. He also asserts that this reason cannot explain the long period of Little Ice Age.
- Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 65
- do you agree or disagree?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 76
- TPO 41-Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children's education than were parents in the past. 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 1373.03311258 68% => OK
No of words: 178.0 270.72406181 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26404494382 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 4.04702891845 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43351825753 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 145.348785872 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629213483146 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 419.366225166 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.8649366635 49.2860985944 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.125 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351416977106 0.272083759551 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15308460795 0.0996497079465 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989760737919 0.0662205650399 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208765132896 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660899730995 0.0443174109184 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.