tpo 28
The material discusses the concept of the fact that Robert E. Peary reached the North Pole. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading topic.
Firstly, the reading details specific points regarding to this topic, namely the National Geographic Society declared that Peary reached the North Pole. Next, there is an evidence that another explorer called Avery did the same trip in less than 37 days. Finally, the photographs that were taken by Peary supported his claim.
Conversely, the listening challenges the points, one specific contradiction is the National Geographic Society was not complete objective and did not take plenty of time; moreover, the investigation did not examine everything carefully. Therefore, it is not trustworthy. In addition to that, the explorer Avery’s slide was much less weight, because his food was dropped by airplane; furthermore, the weather condition was better, which speed up his journey. One final point, Peary’s photographs were not good. They were primitive and unfocus photos. Likewise, the shadow was unclear and faded; so, they could not be used to calculate the position of the sun.
In summary, there are a discrepancies in the information presented.
- the Little Ice Age 32
- people now can live longer which of the following do you think is the main reason for this phenomenontechnological improvementimprove people dietimprovement in the education 76
- tpo 9 3
- parents should teach their kids to manage their own money at young age? 70
- tpo 36 buying a franchise 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 23, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a discrepancy' or simply 'discrepancies'?
Suggestion: a discrepancy; discrepancies
...tion of the sun. In summary, there are a discrepancies in the information presented.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...epancies in the information presented.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, likewise, look, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, while, in addition, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1095.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 200.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.475 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84857420476 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 61.4089020781 49.2860985944 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2307692308 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3846153846 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 7.06452816374 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318008208626 0.272083759551 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119349753101 0.0996497079465 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150393166603 0.0662205650399 227% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175453039947 0.162205337803 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140182755256 0.0443174109184 316% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.85 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.