The reading and lecture both discuss about the Edmontosur. Reading suggests that they have migrate for the survival, the lecture refutes this and says it did not migrate from north slope.
First of all, because 100 millions years ago the north pole was full of ice, in order get the food they might had migrated and they are plant eater. However, the lecture counter this point by saying that in the past earth was warmer and 24 hours sunlight was available during those period. So, they had plenty food sources and during winter they might have used surplus food. Further, vegetation was in-favour of they survival, it does not move anywhere for food.
In addition, the passage suggests that there were plenty of skeleton found in south part of earth which confirm that- they live as herd and migrated to south. But, the professor opposes this view by stating that they lived as herd because to get the extra production from the predator. Even, the Yulk now live as herd to escape predator, it does not mean they migrated.
Finally, reading claims that their physical ability allowed them to migrate such long distance-they can cover up more than 1600 kilometres, all it needs to walk at 5 KMH only to migrate and this is use for them to do. Again, the speaker reputes this statement by explaining that juvenile dinosaurs cannot walk that much fast and they always need the mother support which prevents them to move at such a fast, that is highly impossible. Moreover, they have stay in between journey and they settled down wherever it was possible.
To sum up, reading supports that they migrated to south because of the harsh environment, their skeletons found in south area and their physical capability. But, refuses all these point by some evidences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'migrated'.
Suggestion: migrated
...ntosur. Reading suggests that they have migrate for the survival, the lecture refutes t...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 51, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun skeleton seems to be countable; consider using: 'plenty of skeletons'.
Suggestion: plenty of skeletons
...n, the passage suggests that there were plenty of skeleton found in south part of earth which conf...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uses all these point by some evidences.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, moreover, so, in addition, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 22.412803532 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 303.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87128712871 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27477267576 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567656765677 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9013150867 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.428571429 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247189460871 0.272083759551 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091260795707 0.0996497079465 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611217322451 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147442513277 0.162205337803 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325392017757 0.0443174109184 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.