tpo 30
The lecture and the reading passage discuss a burning mirror as a defines mechanism that the Roman navy used to attacked the Greek port city. On the one hand the reading clearly stat that using the burning mirror use unreal or myth. On the other hand the lecture refutes this, by saying that using it was practical.
First of all, the reading state that the ancient Greeks were not develop enough to use like these mirrors, and need skillful criteria. However, the lecture argues that the ancient Greeks used a lot of pieces to form huge mirror.
In addition, the article makes arguments is that the burning mirror took long time to set the ships on fire. The lecture counter this point by saying that to set a fire it need just 10 minutes, and their ships consist of different materials for example there is a sticky pitch burn with few second that will lead to burn the wood very fast within 10 minutes.
Lastly, the reading argues that the common way of setting the ships was shooting on it. the lecture refutes this claims by pointing that unobserved the mirror and it is more effective than the flaming mirrors.
- tpo 26 75
- Typically, as people age, their bone mass decreases, making them more vulnerable to bone fractures. A recent study concludes that the most effective way to reduce the risk of fractures in later life is to take twice the recommended dose of vitamin D and c 55
- True success can be measured primarily in terms of the goals one sets for oneself.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you ta 64
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific reasons and examples to supp 76
- Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7,000 years ago, and within 3,000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands were extinct. Previous archaeological findings have suggested t 28
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'developed'.
Suggestion: developed
... state that the ancient Greeks were not develop enough to use like these mirrors, and n...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 288, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun second seems to be countable; consider using: 'few seconds'.
Suggestion: few seconds
...ample there is a sticky pitch burn with few second that will lead to burn the wood very fa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, lastly, second, for example, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 1373.03311258 67% => OK
No of words: 200.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.0940630363 2.5805825403 81% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 145.348785872 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 419.366225166 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8939391331 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.888888889 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06452816374 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288009738791 0.272083759551 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128585361282 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735285902616 0.0662205650399 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169476276689 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461603039648 0.0443174109184 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 63.6247240618 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.