TPO 31
The reading claims that pattern of fine lines which surrounded the skeletal bones is not evidence that the Sinosauropteryx were a feathered dinosaur. However, the professor explains that the reasons of the reading is unconvincing and presents some points to refute them all.
First, the author states that the fine line do not blong to a living dinosaur and it is feasible it formed after dinosaur's death. Conversely, the professor casts doubt on this point by saying that the dinosaur's fossil was buried in a place that its functional structure was well preserved and the fine line is not caused because of decomposing.
Second, according to the reading, scientists cannot tell what part of dinosaur's anatomy this fine line structure is. In fact, they believe the fine line is remains of the frill and it has nothing to do with feathers. In contrast, the lecturer opposes this point by saying that the substance of the frill and feather are different. He states that the feathers have some kind of proteins but the frills do not have this and the skeleton of dinosaurs have this kind of protein.
Third, Based on the reading, the usual function of feathers are to help animals fly or regulate their internal temperature and since they are located along the backbone and the tail of the animal. Hence, this suggests that the lines do not represent feathers. On the other hand, the professor states that the feathers have other functions. He gives an example of another animal name peacock which used its tail to attract mail. Also, Sinosauropteryx has colorful feather which displayed it and it has distinctive structure.
Therefore, the specific points mentioned in the reading do not make sense.
- Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities. 70
- TPO 4 80
- Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past. 73
- TPO4 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 201, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'dinosaurs'' or 'dinosaur's'?
Suggestion: dinosaurs'; dinosaur's
... doubt on this point by saying that the dinosaurs fossil was buried in a place that its f...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, well, in contrast, in fact, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 285.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97192982456 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6231772314 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515789473684 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6447116132 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.214285714 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06452816374 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.486700843127 0.272083759551 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151481048648 0.0996497079465 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102624529802 0.0662205650399 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226943203858 0.162205337803 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117337675318 0.0443174109184 265% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.