The reading and the speaker discussing about what cause the quackery sound but in very contrast ways.
Firstly, reading passage says that this frog mimic sound would be from the Ocra whale specially female one, when it wants to attract the male for sex then it produces these kind of sounds. And moreover, the Russian's patrolling couldn't find out through radar detector because the sound made by animals. But the speaker refutes this point by saying that Ocra lives in the on surface of the water not under the deep ocean.
Secondly, reading passage states that sound could be from giant squint but it does not has the skeletal system but it still it capable of sending signal through brain, may be because of curiosity it might had approach the submarine. Still the professor not convinced with this point, he explains that these sound are appearing for last two century and in 1980 the sound was disappear and reappear again at after twenty years so it does not make sense according to professor.
Thirdly, reading passage argues that it could be other country military ship because, recently technology advanced fast so they might have used the technology which not possible by detector. Again the lecturer oppose this point by saying that it is very difficult change the direction of submarine ship quickly and there is no such technology which create zero noise while engine is on. So the other countries ship highly impossible.
To sum up, reading passage suggests that quackery sound could be Ocra, giant squint or foreign military ship but the professor refuses all above statements with reasonable evidences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 168, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...tract the male for sex then it produces these kind of sounds. And moreover, the Russian&ap...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...through radar detector because the sound made by animals. But the speaker refutes...
^^
Line 7, column 88, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'have'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: have
...ld be from giant squint but it does not has the skeletal system but it still it cap...
^^^
Line 7, column 88, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...ld be from giant squint but it does not has the skeletal system but it still it cap...
^^^
Line 7, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rough brain, may be because of curiosity it might had approach the submarine. Sti...
^^
Line 7, column 211, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'approached'.
Suggestion: approached
...y be because of curiosity it might had approach the submarine. Still the professor not ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...y it might had approach the submarine. Still the professor not convinced with this p...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 315, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...his point, he explains that these sound are appearing for last two century and in 1980 the so...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 376, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disappeared'.
Suggestion: disappeared
...t two century and in 1980 the sound was disappear and reappear again at after twenty year...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 435, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...other countries ship highly impossible. To sum up, reading passage suggests that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... military ship but the professor refuses all above statements with reasonable evi...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'third', 'thirdly', 'while', 'kind of', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.220735785953 0.261695866417 84% => OK
Verbs: 0.167224080268 0.158904122519 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0802675585284 0.0723426182421 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.066889632107 0.0435111971325 154% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0367892976589 0.0277247811725 133% => OK
Prepositions: 0.137123745819 0.128828473217 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0468227424749 0.0370669169778 126% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.41000375128 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0100334448161 0.0208969081088 48% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0066889632107 0.00154638098197 433% => OK
Determiners: 0.0936454849498 0.128158765124 73% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0234113712375 0.0158828679856 147% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0133779264214 0.0114777025283 117% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1656.0 1645.83664459 101% => OK
No of words: 271.0 271.125827815 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.11070110701 6.08160592843 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.339483394834 0.374372842146 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.273062730627 0.287516216867 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.177121771218 0.187439937562 94% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.10332103321 0.113142543107 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41000375128 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59778597786 0.539623497131 111% => OK
Word variations: 63.7558919034 53.8517498576 118% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 27.1 21.7502111507 125% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0643716635 49.3711431718 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.6 132.220823453 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1 21.7502111507 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.6 0.878197800319 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 3.39072847682 324% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 54.4062730627 50.5018328374 108% => OK
Elegance: 1.49382716049 1.90840788429 78% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.555192587529 0.549887131256 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0972711479276 0.142949733639 68% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0416794726061 0.0787303798458 53% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.70443179204 0.631733273073 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.175637773793 0.139662658121 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.27256215175 0.266732575781 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805239962725 0.103435571967 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.294413271653 0.414875509568 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.099354351288 0.0530846634433 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.346898616769 0.40443939384 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10733558912 0.0528353158467 203% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.