The reading passage and the lecturer discusses the purpose of the Chaco house in opposit point of views. The lecture refutes the very point in the passage with some explanation, let see on by one.
Firstly, the reading passage says that the native American used this house for the residential purposes but the lecturer contrasts this point by stating that if there is more than 100 rooms there, then there should be more number fire place for cooking but it has few fire places some where around ten.
Secondly, reading passage claims that they may be used it the purposes of storing the grain maize because there is lot of space available for storage but the speaker states that there is possibility for that but during the excavation this building there evidence report for the presence of grain. So it was not used for storage reasons.
Thirdly, reading passage explains that Pueblo may be used this house for the ceremonial functions because the mound are broken, breaking the pot at end of the ceremonial is their culture. But the professor states that when they exam the pot researcher find more than that, they found the sand and stone and building materials. So it may be used for the building construction.
To sum up, by stating that some logical explanation, the speaker conclude that it was not used for the residential, storage or the ceremonial purposes according to the speaker point of view.
- Easter IslandEaster Island, located in the Pacific Ocean about 4000 miles from the coast of Chile, is one of the most isolated places in the world. It is best known for the Moai, monolithic statues of human figures carved from volcanic rock and located a 86
- TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa 70
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 80
- TPO-14 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- TPO-30 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use spec 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...osit point of views. The lecture refutes the very point in the passage with some ...
^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... native American used this house for the residential purposes but the lecturer co...
^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'number' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: number
...n 100 rooms there, then there should be more number fire place for cooking but it has few f...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: SOME_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'somewhere'?
Suggestion: somewhere
... for cooking but it has few fire places some where around ten. Secondly, reading passag...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reaking the pot at end of the ceremonial is their culture. But the professor stat...
^^
Line 9, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...according to the speaker point of view.
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'third', 'thirdly', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.268199233716 0.261695866417 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.149425287356 0.158904122519 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0459770114943 0.0723426182421 64% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0383141762452 0.0435111971325 88% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0344827586207 0.0277247811725 124% => OK
Prepositions: 0.153256704981 0.128828473217 119% => OK
Participles: 0.0536398467433 0.0370669169778 145% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.41763436972 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00766283524904 0.0208969081088 37% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00383141762452 0.00154638098197 248% => OK
Determiners: 0.141762452107 0.128158765124 111% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0153256704981 0.0158828679856 96% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00766283524904 0.0114777025283 67% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1425.0 1645.83664459 87% => OK
No of words: 242.0 271.125827815 89% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88842975207 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04852973271 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.322314049587 0.374372842146 86% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.264462809917 0.287516216867 92% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.152892561983 0.187439937562 82% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0785123966942 0.113142543107 69% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41763436972 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495867768595 0.539623497131 92% => OK
Word variations: 45.6413722191 53.8517498576 85% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0529801325 69% => OK
Sentence length: 26.8888888889 21.7502111507 124% => OK
Sentence length SD: 92.1296724362 49.3711431718 187% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 158.333333333 132.220823453 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8888888889 21.7502111507 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.33333333333 0.878197800319 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 3.39072847682 177% => OK
Readability: 53.3351698806 50.5018328374 106% => OK
Elegance: 2.13793103448 1.90840788429 112% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.456554814739 0.451937469235 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.180948029476 0.142949733639 127% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.10506403415 0.0787303798458 133% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.765796157475 0.631733273073 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.213790998415 0.139662658121 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.269509777581 0.21790590567 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144434562403 0.0871468918476 166% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.403519985071 0.414875509568 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0747295903673 0.0530846634433 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.333424858783 0.332364718235 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128076524913 0.0446026805963 287% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.26048565121 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 0.0 3.49668874172 0% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 3.1766004415 220% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
---------------------
Read good grammar books.
Rates: 63.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.