TPO 34
The reading specifies that there are three theories about the main cause of the extinction of the sea cow. However, the professor explains that we cannot find out what make sea cows extinct and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First, the article claims, sea cows were a good source of food for native siberian people. Consequently, they hunted many of sea cows and after many years they extinct. The professor opposes this point by saying that the sea cows were massive creature and weight ten ton and capturing couple of them could feed many people for a month. Also the population of native siberian were few and it was not vital for them to capture large number of sea cows.
Second, based on the reading, ecosystems disturbances which declined the main source of food of sea cows and these change help its extinction. The lecturer assert that if sever ecosystems disturbances happen and declined the main food of sea cow, it also change the population of other marine animal and native people do not record any food shortage. In other word, the ecological changes near Bering Island did not affect the sea cows' population.
Third, according to the reading, when European fur traders come to the island, they had many weapons that allow them to capture and kill sea cows and because of this sea cows extinct. The speaker contradicts the idea reasoning that the population of sea cows decreases before European fur traders come to the island. Hence, it was another main reason that trigger the reduce of sea cows population and European fur traders did not have a role diminish of sea cows population.
Therefore, the specific reasons mentioned in the reading do not make sense.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-15 | ormon200678 | 60 | view |
| 2022-10-25 | rassata | 70 | view |
| 2022-06-29 | ellen87713 | view | |
| 2022-01-30 | omega93 | 80 | view |
| 2021-07-01 | vida00 | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 336, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...hem could feed many people for a month. Also the population of native siberian were ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'asserts'.
Suggestion: asserts
...hange help its extinction. The lecturer assert that if sever ecosystems disturbances h...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'changes'?
Suggestion: changes
...lined the main food of sea cow, it also change the population of other marine animal a...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cows'' or 'cow's'?
Suggestion: cows'; cow's
...ar Bering Island did not affect the sea cows population. Third, according to the re...
^^^^
Line 4, column 364, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...it was another main reason that trigger the reduce of sea cows population and European fur...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84827586207 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39300407227 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513793103448 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5860234734 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.153846154 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.610977483117 0.272083759551 225% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.249371596479 0.0996497079465 250% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104083291724 0.0662205650399 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308505500939 0.162205337803 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.157893775171 0.0443174109184 356% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.