TPO 34
The lecturer and the reading discuss the extinction of the massive marine mammal that lived in Bering Island off the coast of Siberia. Although the passage claims that there theories about the main cause of the sea cows' extinction, the speaker refutes this idea through several reasons which I will describe in this reporter.
First and foremost, the passage points out that overhunting the sea cow by native people was the main reason for extinction. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that a sea cow was a massive mammal, and it roughly had 10 tone weight and 9 meters long. Also, the population of Sibrian village not many; hence, a couple of sea cow was enough for Siberia village. Therefore, the hunting theory is not correct for declining the sea cow.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that the ecosystem of the Bering Island was destroyed, and the main food source for the sea cows disappeared. The professor argues that if the food source of the see was a decline, the population of other marine animals must be declined like whales. But there is not any evidence to show that the whale population had decreased. Thus, this hypothesis could not be true.
Finally, although the reading passage says that European traders have been hunting the sea cows for fur traders, and it causes declining the sea cows population, the speakers disagree by mentioning that the size of sea cows was declining before European arrived. Therefore, something was causing a massive decline in the sea cows' population long before the time European arrived there, so they were not the main reason for the sea cows' extinction.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-06-15 | ormon200678 | 60 | view |
2022-10-25 | rassata | 70 | view |
2022-06-29 | ellen87713 | view | |
2022-01-30 | omega93 | 80 | view |
2021-07-01 | vida00 | 80 | view |
- Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use spe 66
- TPO 48 78
- TPO 34 76
- If you want to recommend a way to reduce living expenses for your friend, which of the following will you choose? Why? ۱٫ Find a roommate to share a room۲٫ Do not buy the latest mobile phone, Buy new technological devices less frequently۳٫ Buy cheap 68
- Universities should require every graduating student to take public speaking courses 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 12, column 146, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cows'' or 'cow's'?
Suggestion: cows'; cow's
...raders, and it causes declining the sea cows population, the speakers disagree by me...
^^^^
Line 12, column 326, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cows'' or 'cow's'?
Suggestion: cows'; cow's
...as causing a massive decline in the sea cows population long before the time Europea...
^^^^
Line 12, column 432, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cows'' or 'cow's'?
Suggestion: cows'; cow's
...ey were not the main reason for the sea cows extinction.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 277.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98916967509 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50684527272 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519855595668 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1452219253 49.2860985944 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.166666667 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.578648249901 0.272083759551 213% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.220410371307 0.0996497079465 221% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134597243609 0.0662205650399 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.359547862455 0.162205337803 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114206075029 0.0443174109184 258% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.