TPO 44
The lecture and the reading discuss some Europen silver coin that discovered at a Native American archaeological site. Although the passage claims that these coins are fake and they did not represent historical evidence, the speaker refutes this idea th=hrough several reasons which I will describe in this reporter.
First and foremost, the passage points out the coins are discovered far from the Native American settlement in main; hence, they could not belong them. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that many other objects are found the far distance, and these objects are strong historical evidence. She adds that the Native Americal travelled in many places; therefore, they could bring with them several coins and burn in other places.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that no other coins have been found at the Canadian sites, so Norse did not bring silver coins with them to their North American settlements, the professor argues that the Norse did not build permanent settlements in North America, subsequently, they used to pack their valuable properties and bring them back with themselves. Therefore, they might bring the other coins back to Europe.
Finally, although the reading passage says that due to being useless, the Norse would not bring the coin to North America, the speaker disagrees by mentioning that the Native American people known the coins were valuable things. Also, the coins were attracted for them and they used coins for worthwhile and beautiful things such as necklaces.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, while, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1315.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34552845528 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46922026445 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520325203252 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.5862843857 49.2860985944 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.111111111 110.228320801 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 21.698381199 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.77777777778 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.529609929865 0.272083759551 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.218225854363 0.0996497079465 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104275961011 0.0662205650399 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.317517361305 0.162205337803 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580579790874 0.0443174109184 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.3589403974 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.