TPO 36 integrated writing
The reading and the lecture both discuss cloud seeding. While the reading states that cloud seeding is an effective method to protect farms from hails and provides a few evidence of support, On the other hand, the lecture cast doubt on this claim by saying that it is not clear that the cloud seeding technique is effective and refutes each one of the evidence provided in the passage.
To begin with, the reading asserts that in the laboratory settings while adding silver iodide to cold water vapor, they observed light snow instead of hail pellets which is not harmful to vegetation and crops. The lecture contradicts this point by stating that Lab silver Iodide prevents any precipitations whether hail, rain, or snow. Consequently, reduce the amount of rain will lead to drought season which will have an extremely negative effect on the crops in the area.
In addition, the reading claims that cloud seeding has been successfully used to control precipitation in some Asian cities. Furthermore, the optimistic results from using this method in Asia advocate that it could be used effectively to protect farms in the United States as well. The professor refutes this point by pointing out that Cloud seeding approach cannot be repeated in the United States, for the reason that this method would perfectly protect crops in cities with high pollution rates but not in unpolluted areas.
Moreover, The reading states that one study has been conducted in the central of the United States and revealed that hail deterioration decreased in areas where the cloud seeding was used and monitored. Nevertheless, the professor explains that hail damage declined is not limited to the central areas but also south, north, west, and east. In fact all regions of the United States. This is a result of natural variations in the weather but not the cloud seeding technique.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun evidence seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little evidence'.
Suggestion: little evidence
...protect farms from hails and provides a few evidence of support, On the other hand, the lect...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ative effect on the crops in the area. In addition, the reading claims that clo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, while, in addition, in fact, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 310.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04516129032 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51318272494 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535483870968 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.0008903083 49.2860985944 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.333333333 110.228320801 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0833333333 7.06452816374 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.