TPO-4
Both the article and lecture discuss the possibility that the dinosaur were the endotherm, which they could maintain their body temperature constant in the cold or warm weather. The passage provides three evidence to support the claim that dinosaur were the endotherm, however, the speaker casts doubt the evidence proposed in the reading passage.
Firstly, lecturer rejects the point made in the text. She states that Polar Regions in the past were warmer than today and dinosaur who lived in the Polar Regions migrated to warmer areas during cold temperature. She adds that it is possible that the dinosaur may hibernate like modern reptile in the cold weather. Hence, the idea that dinosaur were endotherms is unconvincing. By contrast, the author believes that because the fossils of dinosaur were found in the polar region, it is likely that the dinosaur were endotherms that they maintain body temperature.
Secondly, the professor refutes the idea described in the passage. The professor claims that having leg that located underneath body does not mean that they built for running. She points out that the dinosaur' leg were located underneath body for supporting weight of the dinosaur which allowed them to grow to larger size. Therefore, the idea that the leg underneath body do not indicate that dinosaur were endotherm. On the contrary, the writer brings up a point that since the dinosaur' legs were placed underneath body, they were used for running, as the endotherm had a same function.
Finally, although the writer of the article believes that having Haversian canals in the dinosaur that they could grow faster, means that they were endotherms, the lecturer challenges this claim. It is argued in the lecture that it is true that many dinosaur had Haversian canals, but they also had growth rings. Having growth ring means that the dinosaur did not grow constantly and they grow slowly which followed by rapid growth. So, the slow growth after the rapid growth suggests that they were not endotherm, as the endotherm did not have this characteristic.
- Children would behave negatively before they learn how to behave appropriately. Which of the following behavior would you consider to be the most negative behavior of a child and why?۱٫ Being selfish۲٫ Being impolite۳٫ Being loud 73
- TPO-12 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do. 90
- Why do you think people attend college or university? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation (buses, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 246, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun dinosaur seems to be countable; consider using: 'many dinosaurs'.
Suggestion: many dinosaurs
...ued in the lecture that it is true that many dinosaur had Haversian canals, but they also had...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, it is true, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 27.0 12.0772626932 224% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 43.0 22.412803532 192% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1373.03311258 126% => OK
No of words: 339.0 270.72406181 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11799410029 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48118545689 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463126843658 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.0 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0707882276 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.4375 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1875 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.