tpo 40
The reading passage lists three problems which hinder the establishing or permanent human station on Venus, while the professor in the lecture introduces the solution that building a floating station in the air to solve all the three problems.
The first advantage the lecturer says is that the atmospheric pressure will be lower in the high air. If people can build a floating base above 50 kilometres in the air, the pressure is equal to which in the Earth. That is to say, the worry in the reading that facilities and people will be crushed in Venus can be eliminated.
Secondly, the reading holds the view that the permanent station will be hard to get supplication because Venus lacks natural resources which are indispensable for the living. The professor mentions that people can use some components that existing in the atmosphere in Venus to produce materials people need. For instance, carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid can be used to make water and oxygen, which are necessary for human beings. Thus, the professor fights against the view in the reading again.
Finally, the professor represents his idea that building the station above 50 kilometres can also absorb the sunlight before it is reflected by the thick clouds. Since most of the thick clouds gather in the low air, the station will have enough solar energy form both sun and reflection, providing power to machines and equipment, which is far from the suggestion in the reading that little sun power is insufficient for electricity needs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 259, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
...e station will have enough solar energy form both sun and reflection, providing powe...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1268.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01185770751 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59573977658 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537549407115 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.561090144 49.2860985944 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.8 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232948225027 0.272083759551 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920529070996 0.0996497079465 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450418922207 0.0662205650399 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137123700278 0.162205337803 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285688379773 0.0443174109184 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.