In this set of materials, the reading passage explores the drawbacks of maintaining a human presence, such as the station, on Venus, and the professor's lecture deals with the same topic. However, he casts doubts on these disadvantages, and in the lecture, he provides three specific points to substantiate his opinion.
First, although the reading passage suggests that the atmosphere pressure at Venus' surface is too heavy for humans and for equipment, the professor argues in the lecture that the atmosphere pressure above ground is relatively same as Earth
's atmosphere pressure. Therefore, humans can still construct a station floating in the air, like a hot bloom.
Moreover, despite the statement in the reading that Venus contains sparse oxygen and water, the professor contends that carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid can be used to produce water. Then he supports this point with the fact that by using equipment and chemical reaction on the station, humans can make water from carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid, which are abundant on Venus.
Finally, the professor asserts that clouds on Venus above ground are not thick and sunlight can penetrate through those clouds, whereas the author of the reading claims that clouds on Venus blocks most of the sunlight. The professor explains that this claim is indefensible by pointing out that solar power uses both direct and reflected sunlight to produce electricity.
- TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa 70
- To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In 50
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities. 62
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 73
- TPO-40 - Independent Writing Task Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Discourse Markers used:
['finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'therefore', 'whereas', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.276679841897 0.261695866417 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.130434782609 0.158904122519 82% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0830039525692 0.0723426182421 115% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0355731225296 0.0435111971325 82% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0158102766798 0.0277247811725 57% => OK
Prepositions: 0.162055335968 0.128828473217 126% => OK
Participles: 0.0197628458498 0.0370669169778 53% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.61110087881 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0118577075099 0.0208969081088 57% => OK
Particles: 0.00395256916996 0.00154638098197 256% => OK
Determiners: 0.122529644269 0.128158765124 96% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0158102766798 0.0158828679856 100% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00395256916996 0.0114777025283 34% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1420.0 1645.83664459 86% => OK
No of words: 228.0 271.125827815 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.22807017544 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.04852973271 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.425438596491 0.374372842146 114% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.315789473684 0.287516216867 110% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.232456140351 0.187439937562 124% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.118421052632 0.113142543107 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61110087881 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592105263158 0.539623497131 110% => OK
Word variations: 58.920714061 53.8517498576 109% => OK
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0529801325 61% => OK
Sentence length: 28.5 21.7502111507 131% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6304009465 49.3711431718 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 177.5 132.220823453 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 21.7502111507 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.375 0.878197800319 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 60.0789473684 50.5018328374 119% => OK
Elegance: 2.52173913043 1.90840788429 132% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.631880907921 0.549887131256 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.143574062554 0.142949733639 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0857287472943 0.0787303798458 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.7364741706 0.631733273073 117% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.201324694357 0.139662658121 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.318134818751 0.266732575781 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1302221538 0.103435571967 126% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.274522078819 0.414875509568 66% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0986874510144 0.0530846634433 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.377837890422 0.40443939384 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126645432859 0.0528353158467 240% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 10.2958057395 68% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.