TPO 41
The reading and the lecture are both about creating new and much stricter regulations for handling and storing coal ash. The author of the reading believes that new rules are unnecessary and have negative consequences. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article and brings up three reasons to reject the specific point in the reading passage.She thinks that it is definitely essential to create stricter regulations.
The first point the author makes that the effective environmental regulations already exist so there is no need to create new rules. The lecturer opposes this point by explaining that we require new and stricter regulations due to rules that exist now are not sufficient, for example, the rules for liner are only for an old land filled not the new ones. Therefore, it is vital to have new rules not only for old ones but also to prevent damage of new landing filled.
Secondly, the author contends that by creating very strict rules the recycling of coal ash might be destroyed. It is mentioned that consumers may become concerned of products dangerousness. the lecturer rebuts this argument. By having new rule consumers won't stop recycling. for example, consumers use another hazardous material for environments called Markey despite the fact it has sufficient strict rules for a long time.
Finally, the author states that new regulations would cost more. The articles note that increased cost would not be welcomed by the public. This concept is refused by the lecturer which asserts that this cost is really well worthy. Despite that implementing this would cost around 50 billion dollars, it cost average by only 1 percent more than past.
In conclusion, the lecturer and the author appear to be in disagreement about new rules for coal ash. the lecture contends that it is not good to have stricter regulation, which is contradicted by the lecturer.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO46 80
- TPO 30 60
- TPO7-Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 67
- TPO 46 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 359, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: She
...e specific point in the reading passage.She thinks that it is definitely essential ...
^^^
Line 4, column 190, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...me concerned of products dangerousness. the lecturer rebuts this argument. By havin...
^^^
Line 4, column 275, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...new rule consumers wont stop recycling. for example, consumers use another hazardou...
^^^
Line 6, column 102, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...agreement about new rules for coal ash. the lecture contends that it is not good to...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 311.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12861736334 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9481620572 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511254019293 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 485.1 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.6379890542 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8235294118 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2941176471 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38208733354 0.272083759551 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129692851542 0.0996497079465 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10523407031 0.0662205650399 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214937962083 0.162205337803 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660822178244 0.0443174109184 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.